Re: [OT] (was): Robust Algorithms
From: David James Polewka (joseywales_at_outlaw.nospam)
Date: 12/16/04
- Next message: David James Polewka: "Re: [OT] (was): Robust Algorithms"
- Previous message: David James Polewka: "Re: [OT] (was): Robust Algorithms"
- In reply to: Ralph Hartley: "Re: [OT] (was): Robust Algorithms"
- Next in thread: >parr\(*>: "Re: [OT] (was): Robust Algorithms"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2004 08:28:15 GMT
Ralph Hartley <hartley@aic.nrl.navy.mil> wrote:
>David James Polewka wrote:
>
>> That's right! The number of people who believe something
>> has nothing to do with whether it is true or false! Never has,
>> and never will!
>
>Many people disagree with that!
>
>Sorry, but with a setup like that I just couldn't resist making the joke. I
>tried, I really did.
Yeah, we believe that....REALLY we do.....UH HUUUUH !!@!
=========================
"Endeavor to persevere"
=========================
- Next message: David James Polewka: "Re: [OT] (was): Robust Algorithms"
- Previous message: David James Polewka: "Re: [OT] (was): Robust Algorithms"
- In reply to: Ralph Hartley: "Re: [OT] (was): Robust Algorithms"
- Next in thread: >parr\(*>: "Re: [OT] (was): Robust Algorithms"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]