Re: [OT] (was): Robust Algorithms
From: David James Polewka (joseywales_at_outlaw.nospam)
Date: 12/16/04
- Previous message: David James Polewka: "Re: [OT] (was): Robust Algorithms"
- In reply to: Kent Paul Dolan: "Re: [OT] (was): Robust Algorithms"
- Next in thread: >parr\(*>: "Re: [OT] (was): Robust Algorithms"
- Reply: >parr\(*>: "Re: [OT] (was): Robust Algorithms"
- Reply: Kristian Lahdensuo: "Re: [OT] (was): Robust Algorithms"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2004 08:30:58 GMT
"Kent Paul Dolan" <xanthian@well.com> wrote:
>"stephen" <stephen@nomail.com> wrote:
>> In comp.theory Jón Fairbairn <jon.fairbairn@cl.cam.ac.uk> wrote:
>>> Ralph Hartley <hartley@aic.nrl.navy.mil> writes:
>>>> David James Polewka wrote:
>
>>>>> That's right! The number of people who believe
>>>>> something has nothing to do with whether it is
>>>>> true or false! Never has, and never will!
>
>Poor Polewka, he's still cheesed off because I told
>him he couldn't _vote_ his "God" into existence, no
>matter how many people believe in something for
>which no evidence and no logic exists.
Unemployed, divorced, depressed atheist, tripping on Prozac!
Atheists are selfish, spoiled know-it-alls who refuse to grow up!
=========================
"Endeavor to persevere"
=========================
- Previous message: David James Polewka: "Re: [OT] (was): Robust Algorithms"
- In reply to: Kent Paul Dolan: "Re: [OT] (was): Robust Algorithms"
- Next in thread: >parr\(*>: "Re: [OT] (was): Robust Algorithms"
- Reply: >parr\(*>: "Re: [OT] (was): Robust Algorithms"
- Reply: Kristian Lahdensuo: "Re: [OT] (was): Robust Algorithms"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
