Re: [OT] (was): Robust Algorithms
From: Ralph Hartley (hartley_at_aic.nrl.navy.mil)
Date: 12/16/04
- Next message: Stephen Harris: "Re: Poll: Are PCs Turing Machines?"
- Previous message: W.J. van Hoeve: "CFP: CP-AI-OR 2005: Second call for papers"
- In reply to: Jón Fairbairn: "Re: [OT] (was): Robust Algorithms"
- Next in thread: David James Polewka: "Re: [OT] (was): Robust Algorithms"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2004 17:18:07 -0500
Jón Fairbairn wrote:
> Ralph Hartley <hartley@aic.nrl.navy.mil> writes:
>
>>David James Polewka wrote:
>>
>>>That's right! The number of people who believe something
>>>has nothing to do with whether it is true or false! Never has,
>>>and never will!
>>
>>Many people disagree with that!
>
> Actually, there's an instance where it does: money. If
> enough people believe that the dollar is worth less, it's
> worth less. ;-)
If enough people believe there is a consensus, then there *is* a consensus.
Ralph Hartley
- Next message: Stephen Harris: "Re: Poll: Are PCs Turing Machines?"
- Previous message: W.J. van Hoeve: "CFP: CP-AI-OR 2005: Second call for papers"
- In reply to: Jón Fairbairn: "Re: [OT] (was): Robust Algorithms"
- Next in thread: David James Polewka: "Re: [OT] (was): Robust Algorithms"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|