Re: [OT] (was): Robust Algorithms
From: >parr\(*> (laurykingno_at_SPAMbtinternet.moc)
Date: 12/17/04
- Previous message: Fabian Mueller: "Re: Poll: Are PCs Turing Machines?"
- In reply to: David James Polewka: "Re: [OT] (was): Robust Algorithms"
- Next in thread: Kristian Lahdensuo: "Re: [OT] (was): Robust Algorithms"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2004 10:23:51 +0000 (UTC)
"David James Polewka" <joseywales@outlaw.nospam> wrote in message
news:41c147c6.59503827@news.east.earthlink.net...
| "Kent Paul Dolan" <xanthian@well.com> wrote:
|
| >"stephen" <stephen@nomail.com> wrote:
| >> In comp.theory Jón Fairbairn <jon.fairbairn@cl.cam.ac.uk> wrote:
| >>> Ralph Hartley <hartley@aic.nrl.navy.mil> writes:
| >>>> David James Polewka wrote:
| >
| >>>>> That's right! The number of people who believe
| >>>>> something has nothing to do with whether it is
| >>>>> true or false! Never has, and never will!
| >
| >Poor Polewka, he's still cheesed off because I told
| >him he couldn't _vote_ his "God" into existence, no
| >matter how many people believe in something for
| >which no evidence and no logic exists.
|
| Unemployed, divorced, depressed atheist, tripping on Prozac!
|
| Atheists are selfish, spoiled know-it-alls who refuse to grow up!
In my book, atheists and God-botherers have the same kind of delusion.
They believe something they can't prove. However, those who assert the
existence of one or more gods have far outstripped the atheists in the
childish naivety of their proposed characteristics of their gods.
-- )>==ss$$%PARR(º> Parr
- Previous message: Fabian Mueller: "Re: Poll: Are PCs Turing Machines?"
- In reply to: David James Polewka: "Re: [OT] (was): Robust Algorithms"
- Next in thread: Kristian Lahdensuo: "Re: [OT] (was): Robust Algorithms"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]