Re: SCRATCH SCRATCH WHY YOU ALL HATE ME NOW?
From: |-|erc (h_at_r.c)
Date: 01/14/05
- Next message: poopdeville_at_gmail.com: "Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false?"
- Previous message: Jeffrey Ketland: "Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false?"
- In reply to: poopdeville_at_gmail.com: "Re: SCRATCH SCRATCH WHY YOU ALL HATE ME NOW?"
- Next in thread: poopdeville_at_gmail.com: "Re: SCRATCH SCRATCH WHY YOU ALL HATE ME NOW?"
- Reply: poopdeville_at_gmail.com: "Re: SCRATCH SCRATCH WHY YOU ALL HATE ME NOW?"
- Reply: alex goldman: "Re: SCRATCH SCRATCH WHY YOU ALL HATE ME NOW?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 16:51:04 +1000
> |-|erc wrote:
> > IS AN HONEST ANSWER TOO MUCH TO ASK?
> >
> > DO I HAVE TO BE INSULTED BY 10 PEOPLE HERE INSTEAD?
> >
>
> herc: here's an honest answer. Your question is unclear and you've
> refused the answers to reasonable interpretations of your question.
> You've refused to clarify your question, but instead repeat it
> endlessly and offer insults. People don't like that.
>
> 'cid 'ooh
that is completely untrue and a copout.
the question will be posted 5 posts high every day until it is answered.
the question is perfectly formed, I made it answerable by Cantorians
and its a simple 'how many' question, therefore it is obvious the answer
is a quantity. everything else was a copout. yes a few have got it right,
but that was 5% of the responses so try again.
I've dealt with 1000s of foul skeptics for years going back on their word to do
paranormal tests, I've seen every trick in the book, you are all at childs
play, you want to IGNORE the fact oo digits of a string are all computed-in-order
so you don't let non-cantor-believers into the forum, by using mob tactics.
when you say d(1) != f(1,1) and d(2) != f(2,2) and ....
so 'therefore the sequence is missing', you have NO-objective-criteria, just
a self referential formula. the answer that the diag is a new sequence of
flips of coins from an infinite set of flippers is JUST PREPOSTEROUS,
because CLEARLY (and I use the term wisely) all digits of any random
sequence appear in order on a computable list, as people have stated.
Herc
- Next message: poopdeville_at_gmail.com: "Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false?"
- Previous message: Jeffrey Ketland: "Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false?"
- In reply to: poopdeville_at_gmail.com: "Re: SCRATCH SCRATCH WHY YOU ALL HATE ME NOW?"
- Next in thread: poopdeville_at_gmail.com: "Re: SCRATCH SCRATCH WHY YOU ALL HATE ME NOW?"
- Reply: poopdeville_at_gmail.com: "Re: SCRATCH SCRATCH WHY YOU ALL HATE ME NOW?"
- Reply: alex goldman: "Re: SCRATCH SCRATCH WHY YOU ALL HATE ME NOW?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
