Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false?
From: Torkel Franzen (torkel_at_sm.luth.se)
Date: 01/15/05
- Next message: poopdeville_at_gmail.com: "Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false?"
- Previous message: bryant_j_j_at_yahoo.com: "Re: SCRATCH SCRATCH WHY YOU ALL HATE ME NOW?"
- In reply to: poopdeville_at_gmail.com: "Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false?"
- Next in thread: poopdeville_at_gmail.com: "Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false?"
- Reply: poopdeville_at_gmail.com: "Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 15 Jan 2005 08:23:49 +0100
poopdeville@gmail.com writes:
> Relevant to the existence of truth vis a vis intended models versus
> plain-old models.
That's a bit cryptic, and insufficient to explain such a startling
statement. Since models of ZFC is a very specialized topic, which
is irrelevant to the work of most mathematicians, whereas every
mathematician is familiar with groups, saying that there is
"no relevant distinction" between the two subjects calls for a bit
of elaboration.
- Next message: poopdeville_at_gmail.com: "Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false?"
- Previous message: bryant_j_j_at_yahoo.com: "Re: SCRATCH SCRATCH WHY YOU ALL HATE ME NOW?"
- In reply to: poopdeville_at_gmail.com: "Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false?"
- Next in thread: poopdeville_at_gmail.com: "Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false?"
- Reply: poopdeville_at_gmail.com: "Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|