Re: True = [ proven | provable ]
From: |-|erc (h_at_r.c)
Date: 01/17/05
- Next message: John Savard: "Re: True = [ proven | provable ]"
- Previous message: Mitch Harris: "Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false?"
- In reply to: Ogie Ogelthorpe: "Re: True = [ proven | provable ]"
- Next in thread: Ogie Ogelthorpe: "Re: True = [ proven | provable ]"
- Reply: Ogie Ogelthorpe: "Re: True = [ proven | provable ]"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 22:16:12 +1000
"Ogie Ogelthorpe" <boogieloogie@gmail.com> wrote in ...
> |-|erc wrote:
> > Mathematicians don't need the word true.
> >
> > For "I think its true" say "I think its provable".
> >
> > For "G is true" say "G is proven"
> >
> < snipped the rest of the useless drivel>
>
> The only thing true is that you are a certified nut job who should be
> locked up before you hurt yourself or someone else.
>
> Ogie
Results 1 - 10 of about 45 for author:ogie author:oglethorpe group:rec.org.mensa
Results 1 - 10 of about 10,500 for author:|-|erc group:rec.org.mensa
Can you mensa newbies learn the pecking order, if not some manners?
Herc
- Next message: John Savard: "Re: True = [ proven | provable ]"
- Previous message: Mitch Harris: "Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false?"
- In reply to: Ogie Ogelthorpe: "Re: True = [ proven | provable ]"
- Next in thread: Ogie Ogelthorpe: "Re: True = [ proven | provable ]"
- Reply: Ogie Ogelthorpe: "Re: True = [ proven | provable ]"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
Loading
