Re: ******* TRY THESE SCI.MATH **********

From: The Ghost In The Machine (ewill_at_sirius.athghost7038suus.net)
Date: 01/20/05 

Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 15:00:19 GMT

In sci.logic, |-|erc
<h@r.c>
 wrote
on Thu, 20 Jan 2005 17:54:00 +1000
<3596bpF4ikgt1U1@individual.net>:
>> Hope this helps,
>> Lasse
>
> No, that is the biggest load of bollocks in history, I can't believe you all swallow it.
>
> All you have to do is answer the questions properly.

Define "properly". Are you referring to:

[1] a T/F canvassing methodology that you will later use in a research
    project?
[2] T/F according to |-|erc's Special Computability theory?
[3] T/F according to standard math theory?
[4] other?

> That means giving the answer
> that was asked for, using suitable meanings for the terms.
>
> If you want to discuss your extremely stupid stance on real
> numbers, do it by arguing the true or false value of one of
> the propositions that I disagree with you on.
>
> Strange you can know everything there is to know and you don't
> have to even bother seeing if cardinality theory holds up to
> inspection. You win both ways! Well done!
>
> Herc
> 

-- 
#191, ewill3@earthlink.net
It's still legal to go .sigless.

Relevant Pages
Loading