Re: ******* TRY THESE SCI.MATH **********

From: |-|erc (h_at_r.c)
Date: 01/21/05

  • Next message: |-|erc: "WELL WHICH IS IT... ?" 
    Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 12:30:01 +1000

    > And why wouldn't we swallow it? It's a made up object that obeys
    > certain properties that we define and then build from logically just
    > like all of math. Whatever philosophical reasons you have for
    > rejecting them aren't any less convincing. If you think a contradiction
    > exists, it's your responsibility to prove it but just because you don't
    > like the idea doesn't mean it's not a valid way to math. Frankly I'd
    > take that load of bollocks over your ill-defined drivel any day even if
    > it had a contradiction, because it's at least articulate. When you will
    > realize that math is about one thing - convincing your peers. That's
    > why the rely so heavily on logic and rules of inference which are
    > widely agreed upon, and the fact that you can't get anyone to believe
    > your claims is a pretty solid reason for rejecting them.
    >

    rubbish. assume all oo reals on a list.

    ignore the assumption and construct a new real "different to every other real".

    by definition , there are oo + 1 reals.

    therefore hyperinfinity exists.

    that's your articulate proof. its the century of gooey over it you admire not the
    existance of a hyperinfinity.

    Infinite people flips coins infinite times each.
    take the diagonal, invert it.
    a new sequence.

    just ignore the fact that sequence has been flipped to oo number of coin tosses.

    Herc

  • Next message: |-|erc: "WELL WHICH IS IT... ?"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: ******* TRY THESE SCI.MATH **********
      ... > like the idea doesn't mean it's not a valid way to math. ... assume all oo reals on a list. ... therefore hyperinfinity exists. ... just ignore the fact that sequence has been flipped to oo number of coin tosses. ...
      (sci.logic)
    • Re: ******* TRY THESE SCI.MATH **********
      ... > like the idea doesn't mean it's not a valid way to math. ... assume all oo reals on a list. ... therefore hyperinfinity exists. ... just ignore the fact that sequence has been flipped to oo number of coin tosses. ...
      (sci.math)
    • Re: Multiple infinities - one more look
      ... continued for lager length of digit sequences without limit. ... infinite digit sequences... ... so the resulting reals have an order. ... (i.e. having a finite program to output their digits in sequence). ...
      (sci.math)
    • Re: Galileos Paradox and the Project of the Reals
      ... The way you get reals by a neverending process of generating digits ... and which thereby constructs a sequence of nested intervals whose ... It isn't *already* in the rationals you started with. ...
      (sci.math)
    • Re: Cantor Confusion
      ... least appears to totally disconnect the set of those remaining. ... sequence of reals with each term less than all terms of a strictly ... This is not the case for rationals. ...
      (sci.math)
    Loading