Re: Name the thesis: "Formal sentences capture informal ones"
From: |-|erc (H_at_r.c)
Date: 01/30/05
- Next message: Keith Ramsay: "Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false?"
- Previous message: |-|erc: "Re: Why we cannot compute omega"
- In reply to: tchow_at_lsa.umich.edu: "Name the thesis: "Formal sentences capture informal ones""
- Next in thread: William Elliot: "Re: Name the thesis: "Formal sentences capture informal ones""
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2005 12:57:26 +1000
<tchow@lsa.umich.edu> wrote in >
> (*) Formal sentences (in PA or ZFC for example) adequately express
> their informal counterparts.
>
> Any candidates for a catchy name for (*)?
(*) The Conjecture Conjecture.
Good forward thinking, I tried to formalise something similar with
UTM(sentence, char) mod 27
There exists some t, UTM(t, true_sentence_number) that
gives all the true assertions (sentence UTM#) for some natural language.
In theory, there are very high level TMs that can parse a subset of questions in English
UTM(t100, "what is the capital of australia") = "canberra"
Herc
- Next message: Keith Ramsay: "Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false?"
- Previous message: |-|erc: "Re: Why we cannot compute omega"
- In reply to: tchow_at_lsa.umich.edu: "Name the thesis: "Formal sentences capture informal ones""
- Next in thread: William Elliot: "Re: Name the thesis: "Formal sentences capture informal ones""
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]