comp.theory
By Date
1272 messages sorted by: [ author ] [ thread ] [ subject ]
Starting: 12/30/04
Ending: 01/31/05
- Re: Name the thesis: "Formal sentences capture informal ones" Torkel Franzen (01/31/05)
- Re: Name the thesis: "Formal sentences capture informal ones" tchow_at_lsa.umich.edu (01/31/05)
- Re: Name the thesis: "Formal sentences capture informal ones" LordBeotian (01/31/05)
- Re: Name the thesis: "Formal sentences capture informal ones" Helene.Boucher_at_wanadoo.fr (01/31/05)
- Re: higher-order logic Owen (01/31/05)
- Re: Name the thesis: "Formal sentences capture informal ones" Lee Rudolph (01/31/05)
- Re: Name the thesis: "Formal sentences capture informal ones" LordBeotian (01/31/05)
- Re: Name the thesis: "Formal sentences capture informal ones" Herman Jurjus (01/31/05)
- Re: Name the thesis: "Formal sentences capture informal ones" Mitch Harris (01/31/05)
- Re: My claim on Omega's defn r.e.s. (01/31/05)
- Re: Name the thesis: "Formal sentences capture informal ones" Mitch Harris (01/31/05)
- Re: My claim on Omega's defn The Ghost In The Machine (01/31/05)
- Re: Name the thesis: "Formal sentences capture informal ones" |-|erc (01/31/05)
- Re: My claim on Omega's defn |-|erc (01/31/05)
- Re: A Class of X3SAT Solvable in PolyTime Russell Easterly (01/31/05)
- Re: Name the thesis: "Formal sentences capture informal ones" Torkel Franzen (01/31/05)
- Re: Name the thesis: "Formal sentences capture informal ones" Torkel Franzen (01/31/05)
- Re: My claim on Omega's defn r.e.s. (01/31/05)
- Re: My claim on Omega's defn |-|erc (01/31/05)
- Re: My claim on Omega's defn The Ghost In The Machine (01/31/05)
- Re: My claim on Omega's defn |-|erc (01/31/05)
- Re: My claim on Omega's defn Arthur Fischer (01/31/05)
- Re: My claim on Omega's defn Arthur Fischer (01/31/05)
- Re: My claim on Omega's defn rupertmccallum_at_yahoo.com (01/31/05)
- Re: My claim on Omega's defn |-|erc (01/31/05)
- Re: higher-order logic H. Enderton (01/30/05)
- Re: Name the thesis: "Formal sentences capture informal ones" tchow_at_lsa.umich.edu (01/30/05)
- Re: Name the thesis: "Formal sentences capture informal ones" tchow_at_lsa.umich.edu (01/30/05)
- Re: higher-order logic alex goldman (01/30/05)
- Re: Name the thesis: "Formal sentences capture informal ones" Torkel Franzen (01/30/05)
- Re: Name the thesis: "Formal sentences capture informal ones" Helene.Boucher_at_wanadoo.fr (01/30/05)
- Re: Name the thesis: "Formal sentences capture informal ones" Torkel Franzen (01/30/05)
- Re: Name the thesis: "Formal sentences capture informal ones" Helene.Boucher_at_wanadoo.fr (01/30/05)
- Re: Name the thesis: "Formal sentences capture informal ones" Torkel Franzen (01/30/05)
- Re: Name the thesis: "Formal sentences capture informal ones" Helene.Boucher_at_wanadoo.fr (01/30/05)
- Re: Name the thesis: "Formal sentences capture informal ones" Torkel Franzen (01/30/05)
- Re: Name the thesis: "Formal sentences capture informal ones" Helene.Boucher_at_wanadoo.fr (01/30/05)
- Re: Name the thesis: "Formal sentences capture informal ones" Torkel Franzen (01/30/05)
- Re: Name the thesis: "Formal sentences capture informal ones" Helene.Boucher_at_wanadoo.fr (01/30/05)
- Re: Name the thesis: "Formal sentences capture informal ones" Stephen Harris (01/30/05)
- Re: Name the thesis: "Formal sentences capture informal ones" Torkel Franzen (01/30/05)
- Re: Name the thesis: "Formal sentences capture informal ones" Helene.Boucher_at_wanadoo.fr (01/30/05)
- Re: Name the thesis: "Formal sentences capture informal ones" Torkel Franzen (01/30/05)
- Re: Name the thesis: "Formal sentences capture informal ones" Helene.Boucher_at_wanadoo.fr (01/30/05)
- FACS FACTS Newsletter Call for Contributions on Formal Aspects of Computing Science (deadline 11 February 2005) Paul Boca (01/30/05)
- Re: Name the thesis: "Formal sentences capture informal ones" Helene.Boucher_at_wanadoo.fr (01/30/05)
- Re: My claim on Omega's defn Arthur Fischer (01/30/05)
- Re: Name the thesis: "Formal sentences capture informal ones" LordBeotian (01/30/05)
- Re: Name the thesis: "Formal sentences capture informal ones" Helene.Boucher_at_wanadoo.fr (01/30/05)
- Re: Name the thesis: "Formal sentences capture informal ones" Torkel Franzen (01/30/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Daryl McCullough (01/30/05)
- Re: Name the thesis: "Formal sentences capture informal ones" Helene.Boucher_at_wanadoo.fr (01/30/05)
- Re: Name the thesis: "Formal sentences capture informal ones" Torkel Franzen (01/30/05)
- Re: Name the thesis: "Formal sentences capture informal ones" Helene.Boucher_at_wanadoo.fr (01/30/05)
- Re: Name the thesis: "Formal sentences capture informal ones" LordBeotian (01/30/05)
- Re: Name the thesis: "Formal sentences capture informal ones" Aatu Koskensilta (01/30/05)
- Re: Name the thesis: "Formal sentences capture informal ones" Torkel Franzen (01/30/05)
- Re: Name the thesis: "Formal sentences capture informal ones" Helene.Boucher_at_wanadoo.fr (01/30/05)
- Re: Name the thesis: "Formal sentences capture informal ones" LordBeotian (01/30/05)
- Re: Name the thesis: "Formal sentences capture informal ones" |-|erc (01/30/05)
- Re: Name the thesis: "Formal sentences capture informal ones" Helene.Boucher_at_wanadoo.fr (01/30/05)
- Re: Name the thesis: "Formal sentences capture informal ones" Helene.Boucher_at_wanadoo.fr (01/30/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? LordBeotian (01/30/05)
- Re: Name the thesis: "Formal sentences capture informal ones" Torkel Franzen (01/30/05)
- Re: Name the thesis: "Formal sentences capture informal ones" Helene.Boucher_at_wanadoo.fr (01/30/05)
- My claim on Omega's defn |-|erc (01/30/05)
- Re: Name the thesis: "Formal sentences capture informal ones" r.e.s. (01/30/05)
- Re: Name the thesis: "Formal sentences capture informal ones" |-|erc (01/30/05)
- Re: Name the thesis: "Formal sentences capture informal ones" Torkel Franzen (01/30/05)
- Re: Name the thesis: "Formal sentences capture informal ones" William Elliot (01/30/05)
- Re: Name the thesis: "Formal sentences capture informal ones" William Elliot (01/30/05)
- Re: Is it known whether or not integer factoring is NP-complete? Amar (01/30/05)
- Re: Is it known whether or not integer factoring is NP-complete? Amar (01/30/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Keith Ramsay (01/30/05)
- Re: Name the thesis: "Formal sentences capture informal ones" |-|erc (01/30/05)
- Re: Why we cannot compute omega |-|erc (01/30/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Barb Knox (01/30/05)
- Re: A Class of X3SAT Solvable in PolyTime Russell Easterly (01/30/05)
- Re: Name the thesis: "Formal sentences capture informal ones" tchow_at_lsa.umich.edu (01/30/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? tchow_at_lsa.umich.edu (01/30/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Mike Oliver (01/29/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Daryl McCullough (01/29/05)
- Re: Name the thesis: "Formal sentences capture informal ones" Aatu Koskensilta (01/29/05)
- Re: Name the thesis: "Formal sentences capture informal ones" Torkel Franzen (01/29/05)
- Re: Name the thesis: "Formal sentences capture informal ones" tchow_at_lsa.umich.edu (01/29/05)
- Re: Name the thesis: "Formal sentences capture informal ones" Aatu Koskensilta (01/29/05)
- Re: Name the thesis: "Formal sentences capture informal ones" r.e.s. (01/29/05)
- Re: Name the thesis: "Formal sentences capture informal ones" tchow_at_lsa.umich.edu (01/29/05)
- Re: Name the thesis: "Formal sentences capture informal ones" Torkel Franzen (01/29/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? mareg_at_mimosa.csv.warwick.ac.uk (01/29/05)
- Re: Name the thesis: "Formal sentences capture informal ones" Aatu Koskensilta (01/29/05)
- Re: Name the thesis: "Formal sentences capture informal ones" tchow_at_lsa.umich.edu (01/29/05)
- Re: Name the thesis: "Formal sentences capture informal ones" Torkel Franzen (01/29/05)
- Name the thesis: "Formal sentences capture informal ones" tchow_at_lsa.umich.edu (01/29/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Mike Oliver (01/29/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? LordBeotian (01/29/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? tchow_at_lsa.umich.edu (01/29/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? mareg_at_mimosa.csv.warwick.ac.uk (01/29/05)
- Re: Is it known whether or not integer factoring is NP-complete? tchow_at_lsa.umich.edu (01/29/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? tchow_at_lsa.umich.edu (01/29/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Acme Diagnostics (01/29/05)
- Re: Why we cannot compute omega examachine_at_gmail.com (01/29/05)
- Re: Herc defines the HOLY GRAIL OF MATHEMATICS David Bernier (01/29/05)
- Re: Herc defines the HOLY GRAIL OF MATHEMATICS |-|erc (01/29/05)
- Re: Why we cannot compute omega |-|erc (01/29/05)
- Re: Herc defines the HOLY GRAIL OF MATHEMATICS r.e.s. (01/29/05)
- Re: Why we cannot compute omega r.e.s. (01/29/05)
- Re: Herc defines the HOLY GRAIL OF MATHEMATICS |-|erc (01/29/05)
- Re: Herc defines the HOLY GRAIL OF MATHEMATICS r.e.s. (01/29/05)
- Re: Is it known whether or not integer factoring is NP-complete? newstome_at_comcast.net (01/29/05)
- Re: Herc defines the HOLY GRAIL OF MATHEMATICS |-|erc (01/29/05)
- Re: Herc defines the HOLY GRAIL OF MATHEMATICS examachine_at_gmail.com (01/29/05)
- Re: Why we cannot compute omega examachine_at_gmail.com (01/29/05)
- Re: Why we cannot compute omega |-|erc (01/29/05)
- Re: Why we cannot compute omega r.e.s. (01/29/05)
- Re: Herc defines the HOLY GRAIL OF MATHEMATICS |-|erc (01/29/05)
- Re: Herc defines the HOLY GRAIL OF MATHEMATICS r.e.s. (01/29/05)
- Re: Why we cannot compute omega |-|erc (01/29/05)
- Re: Why we cannot compute omega r.e.s. (01/29/05)
- Re: Herc defines the HOLY GRAIL OF MATHEMATICS |-|erc (01/29/05)
- Re: Herc defines the HOLY GRAIL OF MATHEMATICS r.e.s. (01/29/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Daryl McCullough (01/29/05)
- Re: Graph drawing tool Mladen Adamovic (01/29/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Torkel Franzen (01/29/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? poopdeville_at_gmail.com (01/29/05)
- Re: ******* TRY THESE SCI.MATH ********** |-|erc (01/29/05)
- Re: Why we cannot compute omega |-|erc (01/29/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Lee Rudolph (01/29/05)
- Re: ******* TRY THESE SCI.MATH ********** The Ghost In The Machine (01/29/05)
- Re: Herc defines the HOLY GRAIL OF MATHEMATICS |-|erc (01/29/05)
- Re: Herc defines the HOLY GRAIL OF MATHEMATICS David Bernier (01/29/05)
- Re: Why we cannot compute omega r.e.s. (01/29/05)
- Re: Why we cannot compute omega |-|erc (01/29/05)
- Re: Herc defines the HOLY GRAIL OF MATHEMATICS r.e.s. (01/29/05)
- Re: Why we cannot compute omega r.e.s. (01/29/05)
- Herc defines the HOLY GRAIL OF MATHEMATICS |-|erc (01/29/05)
- Re: ******* TRY THESE SCI.MATH ********** |-|erc (01/29/05)
- Re: ******* TRY THESE SCI.MATH ********** The Ghost In The Machine (01/29/05)
- Re: Is it known whether or not integer factoring is NP-complete? el goog (01/29/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Jeffrey Ketland (01/29/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? poopdeville_at_gmail.com (01/29/05)
- Re: ******* TRY THESE SCI.MATH ********** |-|erc (01/29/05)
- Re: Why we cannot compute omega |-|erc (01/29/05)
- Re: Why we cannot compute omega |-|erc (01/29/05)
- Re: Random reals are not computable! |-|erc (01/29/05)
- Re: Is it known whether or not integer factoring is NP-complete? tchow_at_lsa.umich.edu (01/29/05)
- Re: Is it known whether or not integer factoring is NP-complete? tchow_at_lsa.umich.edu (01/29/05)
- Re: Is it known whether or not integer factoring is NP-complete? newstome_at_comcast.net (01/28/05)
- Re: Is it known whether or not integer factoring is NP-complete? Amar (01/28/05)
- Re: Decidabilty of a problem of regular languages David Wagner (01/28/05)
- Ambiguous and not ambiguous Context Free Grammars iluhinson_at_gmail.com (01/28/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Jeffrey Ketland (01/28/05)
- Re: Why we cannot compute omega Alan Smaill (01/28/05)
- Re: Is it known whether or not integer factoring is NP-complete? tchow_at_lsa.umich.edu (01/28/05)
- Re: Why we cannot compute omega examachine_at_gmail.com (01/28/05)
- Re: Is it known whether or not integer factoring is NP-complete? Amar (01/28/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Torkel Franzen (01/28/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? tchow_at_lsa.umich.edu (01/28/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? poopdeville_at_gmail.com (01/28/05)
- Decidabilty of a problem of regular languages Miguel.V (01/28/05)
- Re: Graph drawing tool nszabolcs (01/28/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Torkel Franzen (01/28/05)
- Re: Is it known whether or not integer factoring is NP-complete? tchow_at_lsa.umich.edu (01/28/05)
- Re: Is it known whether or not integer factoring is NP-complete? Torben Ćgidius Mogensen (01/28/05)
- Re: Is it known whether or not integer factoring is NP-complete? Mitch Harris (01/28/05)
- Re: Is it known whether or not integer factoring is NP-complete? Torben Ćgidius Mogensen (01/28/05)
- Re: higher-order logic Jose Juan Mendoza Rodriguez (01/28/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Jeffrey Ketland (01/28/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? poopdeville_at_gmail.com (01/28/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Jeffrey Ketland (01/28/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? poopdeville_at_gmail.com (01/28/05)
- A Class of X3SAT Solvable in PolyTime Russell Easterly (01/28/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? poopdeville_at_gmail.com (01/28/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Jeffrey Ketland (01/28/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Jeffrey Ketland (01/28/05)
- Re: Why we cannot compute omega r.e.s. (01/28/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? poopdeville_at_gmail.com (01/28/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? poopdeville_at_gmail.com (01/28/05)
- Is it known whether or not integer factoring is NP-complete? Kerry Soileau (01/28/05)
- Re: Why we cannot compute omega Chairman of the David Hilbert Appreciation Society (01/28/05)
- Re: Why we cannot compute omega examachine_at_gmail.com (01/27/05)
- Re: AI will never work in 100 years !!!! Lester Zick (01/27/05)
- Re: AI will never work in 100 years !!!! Scott Dorsey (01/27/05)
- Re: Why we cannot compute omega Barb Knox (01/27/05)
- Re: AI will never work in 100 years !!!! Lester Zick (01/27/05)
- Re: Finding Maximal Clique Guenter Stertenbrink (01/27/05)
- Re: finding ALL shortest paths from i to j (not All pair shortest paths) Guenter Stertenbrink (01/27/05)
- Re: AI will never work in 100 years !!!! euclid (01/27/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? tchow_at_lsa.umich.edu (01/27/05)
- Re: WELL WHICH IS IT... ? Ralph Hartley (01/27/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? tchow_at_lsa.umich.edu (01/27/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Jeffrey Ketland (01/27/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? tchow_at_lsa.umich.edu (01/27/05)
- Re: ******* TRY THESE SCI.MATH ********** The Ghost In The Machine (01/27/05)
- higher-order logic alex goldman (01/27/05)
- Re: Random reals are not computable! Will Twentyman (01/27/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? poopdeville_at_gmail.com (01/27/05)
- Re: Graph drawing tool Roderick Bloem (01/27/05)
- Re: Why we cannot compute omega r.e.s. (01/27/05)
- Re: Metaphysics of Potential Infinity Mitch Harris (01/27/05)
- Re: ******* TRY THESE SCI.MATH ********** |-|erc (01/27/05)
- Re: ******* TRY THESE SCI.MATH ********** The Ghost In The Machine (01/27/05)
- Re: Why we cannot compute omega |-|erc (01/27/05)
- Re: Why we cannot compute omega |-|erc (01/27/05)
- Re: Why we cannot compute omega r.e.s. (01/27/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Daryl McCullough (01/27/05)
- Re: Why we cannot compute omega |-|erc (01/27/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Daryl McCullough (01/27/05)
- Re: Why we cannot compute omega examachine_at_gmail.com (01/27/05)
- Re: Why we cannot compute omega r.e.s. (01/27/05)
- Re: solving SAT: generating extended resolution proofs using techniques for resolution? Will Nayor (01/27/05)
- Re: another moron Re: John misses point Re: FUCKING RUDE CHAP Re: Idiocy of Muckenheim was Re: countability of reals examachine_at_gmail.com (01/27/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? tchow_at_lsa.umich.edu (01/27/05)
- Re: Why we cannot compute omega Barb Knox (01/27/05)
- Re: solving SAT: generating extended resolution proofs using techniques for resolution? Thomas A. Li (01/27/05)
- Re: Random reals are not computable! |-|erc (01/27/05)
- Re: ******* TRY THESE SCI.MATH ********** |-|erc (01/27/05)
- Re: Why we cannot compute omega |-|erc (01/27/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Mike Oliver (01/27/05)
- Re: AI will never work in 100 years !!!! Scott Dorsey (01/27/05)
- Re: AI will never work in 100 years !!!! pleonasm (01/27/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Daryl McCullough (01/27/05)
- Re: Making images - best language? ronaldfinkbine_at_hotmail.com (01/26/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Mike Oliver (01/26/05)
- Re: Why we cannot compute omega examachine_at_gmail.com (01/26/05)
- Re: Random reals are not computable! examachine_at_gmail.com (01/26/05)
- Re: Random reals are not computable! examachine_at_gmail.com (01/26/05)
- Re: Random reals are not computable! examachine_at_gmail.com (01/26/05)
- Re: Random reals are not computable! Daryl McCullough (01/26/05)
- Re: Metaphysics of Potential Infinity examachine_at_gmail.com (01/26/05)
- Graph drawing tool ronaldfinkbine_at_hotmail.com (01/26/05)
- Re: Random reals are not computable! Mike Oliver (01/26/05)
- Re: Random reals are not computable! r.e.s. (01/26/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? tchow_at_lsa.umich.edu (01/26/05)
- Re: ******* TRY THESE SCI.MATH ********** The Ghost In The Machine (01/26/05)
- Re: ******* TRY THESE SCI.MATH ********** The Ghost In The Machine (01/26/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? tchow_at_lsa.umich.edu (01/26/05)
- Re: Random reals are not computable! Jeffrey Ketland (01/26/05)
- Re: Random reals are not computable! examachine_at_gmail.com (01/26/05)
- Re: Random reals are not computable! Torkel Franzen (01/26/05)
- Re: Random reals are not computable! examachine_at_gmail.com (01/26/05)
- Re: Random reals are not computable! examachine_at_gmail.com (01/26/05)
- Re: solving SAT: generating extended resolution proofs using techniques for resolution? Will Nayor (01/26/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Ralph Hartley (01/26/05)
- Re: solving SAT: generating extended resolution proofs using techniques for resolution? Thomas A. Li (01/26/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Daryl McCullough (01/26/05)
- Re: ******* TRY THESE SCI.MATH ********** |-|erc (01/26/05)
- Re: ******* TRY THESE SCI.MATH ********** Dave Seaman (01/26/05)
- Re: ******* TRY THESE SCI.MATH ********** |-|erc (01/26/05)
- Re: ******* TRY THESE SCI.MATH ********** LordBeotian (01/26/05)
- Re: A New Layer on the USENET yaoziyuan_at_gmail.com (01/26/05)
- Re: ******* TRY THESE SCI.MATH ********** |-|erc (01/26/05)
- Re: ******* TRY THESE SCI.MATH ********** LordBeotian (01/26/05)
- Re: ******* TRY THESE SCI.MATH ********** |-|erc (01/26/05)
- Re: Metaphysics of Potential Infinity Mitch Harris (01/26/05)
- two questions about unicyclic graph Joe (01/26/05)
- Re: A New Layer on the USENET yaoziyuan_at_gmail.com (01/26/05)
- Re: ******* TRY THESE SCI.MATH ********** LordBeotian (01/26/05)
- Re: ******* TRY THESE SCI.MATH ********** |-|erc (01/26/05)
- Re: ******* TRY THESE SCI.MATH ********** LordBeotian (01/26/05)
- Re: ******* TRY THESE SCI.MATH ********** |-|erc (01/26/05)
- Re: ******* TRY THESE SCI.MATH ********** LordBeotian (01/26/05)
- Re: ******* TRY THESE SCI.MATH ********** bryant_j_j_at_yahoo.com (01/26/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? poopdeville_at_gmail.com (01/26/05)
- Re: ******* TRY THESE SCI.MATH ********** |-|erc (01/26/05)
- Q: solving SAT: generating extended resolution proofs using techniques for resolution? Will Nayor (01/26/05)
- Re: Random reals are not computable! |-|erc (01/26/05)
- Re: Random reals are not computable! Torkel Franzen (01/26/05)
- Re: WELL WHICH IS IT... ? The Ghost In The Machine (01/26/05)
- Re: ******* TRY THESE SCI.MATH ********** The Ghost In The Machine (01/26/05)
- Re: A New Layer on the USENET yaoziyuan_at_gmail.com (01/26/05)
- Re: THERE ARE oo DIGITS IN < 0 . 1 2 1 2 1.. > valdez (01/26/05)
- Re: THERE ARE oo DIGITS IN < 0 . 1 2 1 2 1.. > valdez (01/26/05)
- A New Layer on the USENET yaoziyuan_at_gmail.com (01/26/05)
- Re: THERE ARE oo DIGITS IN < 0 . 1 2 1 2 1.. > valdez (01/26/05)
- Re: Idiocy of Muckenheim was Re: countability of reals |-|erc (01/26/05)
- Re: THERE ARE oo DIGITS IN < 0 . 1 2 1 2 1.. > |-|erc (01/26/05)
- Re: THERE ARE oo DIGITS IN < 0 . 1 2 1 2 1.. > George Cox (01/26/05)
- Re: Idiocy of Muckenheim was Re: countability of reals Piotr Sawuk (01/26/05)
- Re: THERE ARE oo DIGITS IN < 0 . 1 2 1 2 1.. > |-|erc (01/26/05)
- Re: THERE ARE oo DIGITS IN < 0 . 1 2 1 2 1.. > George Cox (01/26/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? tchow_at_lsa.umich.edu (01/26/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Jeffrey Ketland (01/26/05)
- Re: How far can you move the bar MONOSPACED |-|erc (01/26/05)
- Re: How far can you move the bar MONOSPACED Will Twentyman (01/26/05)
- Re: How far can you move the bar MONOSPACED |-|erc (01/26/05)
- Re: THERE ARE oo DIGITS IN < 0 . 1 2 1 2 1.. > |-|erc (01/26/05)
- Re: How far can you move the bar MONOSPACED Will Twentyman (01/26/05)
- Re: THERE ARE oo DIGITS IN < 0 . 1 2 1 2 1.. > valdez (01/26/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Mike Oliver (01/26/05)
- Re: Metaphysics of Potential Infinity poopdeville_at_gmail.com (01/26/05)
- Re: THERE ARE oo DIGITS IN < 0 . 1 2 1 2 1.. > |-|erc (01/26/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? poopdeville_at_gmail.com (01/26/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? poopdeville_at_gmail.com (01/26/05)
- Re: True = [ proven | provable ] |-|erc (01/26/05)
- Re: How far can you move the bar MONOSPACED |-|erc (01/26/05)
- Re: ******* TRY THESE SCI.MATH ********** |-|erc (01/26/05)
- Re: Random reals are not computable! examachine_at_gmail.com (01/26/05)
- Re: True = [ proven | provable ] John Titor (01/26/05)
- Re: Random reals are not computable! examachine_at_gmail.com (01/26/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Mike Oliver (01/25/05)
- Re: Why we cannot compute omega Will Twentyman (01/25/05)
- Re: Random reals are not computable! Acme Diagnostics (01/25/05)
- Re: Random reals are not computable! Acme Diagnostics (01/25/05)
- Re: Why we cannot compute omega Will Twentyman (01/25/05)
- Re: How far can you move the bar MONOSPACED Will Twentyman (01/25/05)
- Re: How far can you move the bar MONOSPACED Will Twentyman (01/25/05)
- Re: Random reals are not computable! Mike Oliver (01/25/05)
- Re: Random reals are not computable! Torkel Franzen (01/25/05)
- Re: Why we cannot compute omega examachine_at_gmail.com (01/25/05)
- Re: Finding Maximal Clique gcrhoads_at_yahoo.com (01/25/05)
- Re: Why we cannot compute omega examachine_at_gmail.com (01/25/05)
- Re: Metaphysics of Potential Infinity examachine_at_gmail.com (01/25/05)
- Re: Metaphysics of Potential Infinity examachine_at_gmail.com (01/25/05)
- Re: Random reals are not computable! examachine_at_gmail.com (01/25/05)
- Re: Random reals are not computable! examachine_at_gmail.com (01/25/05)
- Re: Metaphysics of Potential Infinity examachine_at_gmail.com (01/25/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? tchow_at_lsa.umich.edu (01/25/05)
- Re: Random reals are not computable! Torkel Franzen (01/25/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? poopdeville_at_gmail.com (01/25/05)
- Re: Random reals are not computable! examachine_at_gmail.com (01/25/05)
- Re: Random reals are not computable! Daryl McCullough (01/25/05)
- Re: Why we cannot compute omega examachine_at_gmail.com (01/25/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? poopdeville_at_gmail.com (01/25/05)
- Re: ******* TRY THESE SCI.MATH ********** Patricia Shanahan (01/25/05)
- Re: ******* TRY THESE SCI.MATH ********** LordBeotian (01/25/05)
- Re: Random reals are not computable! Mike Oliver (01/25/05)
- Re: Random reals are not computable! examachine_at_gmail.com (01/25/05)
- Re: Random reals are not computable! Lee Rudolph (01/25/05)
- Re: Random reals are not computable! Torkel Franzen (01/25/05)
- Re: Random reals are not computable! Mike Oliver (01/25/05)
- Prime Factor-Based n-ary Tree Foobarus Frobinium (01/25/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? tchow_at_lsa.umich.edu (01/25/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Mike Oliver (01/25/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? tchow_at_lsa.umich.edu (01/25/05)
- Re: WELL WHICH IS IT... ? Ralph Hartley (01/25/05)
- Re: Why we cannot compute omega Arthur Fischer (01/25/05)
- Re: Metaphysics of Potential Infinity examachine_at_gmail.com (01/25/05)
- Random reals are not computable! examachine_at_gmail.com (01/25/05)
- Re: ******* TRY THESE SCI.MATH ********** |-|erc (01/25/05)
- Re: ******* TRY THESE SCI.MATH ********** LordBeotian (01/25/05)
- Re: ******* TRY THESE SCI.MATH ********** |-|erc (01/25/05)
- Re: ******* TRY THESE SCI.MATH ********** Will Twentyman (01/25/05)
- Re: Who can prove Boruvka's algorithm ? Ivan Kopecek (01/25/05)
- Re: ******* TRY THESE SCI.MATH ********** LordBeotian (01/25/05)
- Re: How far can you move the bar MONOSPACED The Ghost In The Machine (01/25/05)
- Re: AI will never work in 100 years !!!! nobody (01/25/05)
- Re: Why we cannot compute omega |-|erc (01/25/05)
- Re: Why we cannot compute omega george (01/25/05)
- Re: How far can you move the bar MONOSPACED |-|erc (01/25/05)
- Re: ******* TRY THESE SCI.MATH ********** The Ghost In The Machine (01/25/05)
- Re: Why we cannot compute omega The Ghost In The Machine (01/25/05)
- Re: How far can you move the bar MONOSPACED The Ghost In The Machine (01/25/05)
- Re: AI will never work in 100 years !!!! xanthian_at_well.com (01/25/05)
- Re: AI will never work in 100 years !!!! xanthian_at_well.com (01/25/05)
- Re: Why we cannot compute omega bryant_j_j_at_yahoo.com (01/25/05)
- Re: Why we cannot compute omega |-|erc (01/25/05)
- Re: Why we cannot compute omega bryant_j_j_at_yahoo.com (01/25/05)
- Re: Why we cannot compute omega |-|erc (01/25/05)
- Re: Why we cannot compute omega bryant_j_j_at_yahoo.com (01/25/05)
- Re: Why we cannot compute omega |-|erc (01/25/05)
- Re: Why we cannot compute omega |-|erc (01/25/05)
- Re: Why we cannot compute omega bryant_j_j_at_yahoo.com (01/25/05)
- Re: Why we cannot compute omega |-|erc (01/25/05)
- Re: Why we cannot compute omega |-|erc (01/25/05)
- Re: How far can you move the bar MONOSPACED bryant_j_j_at_yahoo.com (01/25/05)
- Re: How far can you move the bar MONOSPACED |-|erc (01/25/05)
- Re: ******* TRY THESE SCI.MATH ********** |-|erc (01/25/05)
- Re: ******* TRY THESE SCI.MATH ********** rupertmccallum_at_yahoo.com (01/25/05)
- Re: Metaphysics of Potential Infinity examachine_at_gmail.com (01/25/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? poopdeville_at_gmail.com (01/24/05)
- Universal Hashing Functions for strings John (01/24/05)
- Re: ******* TRY THESE SCI.MATH ********** LordBeotian (01/24/05)
- Re: Why we cannot compute omega Charlie-Boo (01/24/05)
- Re: Why we cannot compute omega Will Twentyman (01/24/05)
- Re: How far can you move the bar MONOSPACED Will Twentyman (01/24/05)
- Re: ******* TRY THESE SCI.MATH ********** Will Twentyman (01/24/05)
- Re: AI will never work in 100 years !!!! Miss Elaine Eos (01/24/05)
- Re: Why we cannot compute omega examachine_at_gmail.com (01/24/05)
- Re: Why we cannot compute omega examachine_at_gmail.com (01/24/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Jeffrey Ketland (01/24/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? tchow_at_lsa.umich.edu (01/24/05)
- Re: Why we cannot compute omega |-|erc (01/24/05)
- Re: Why we cannot compute omega examachine_at_gmail.com (01/24/05)
- Re: Why we cannot compute omega |-|erc (01/24/05)
- Re: Why we cannot compute omega examachine_at_gmail.com (01/24/05)
- Re: AI will never work in 100 years !!!! examachine_at_gmail.com (01/24/05)
- Re: Why we cannot compute omega |-|erc (01/24/05)
- Re: ******* TRY THESE SCI.MATH ********** |-|erc (01/24/05)
- Re: ******* TRY THESE SCI.MATH ********** The Ghost In The Machine (01/24/05)
- Re: Why we cannot compute omega examachine_at_gmail.com (01/24/05)
- Re: [complexity][algorithm] Find a clique in a graph Marco (01/24/05)
- Re: [complexity][algorithm] Find a clique in a graph Marco (01/24/05)
- Re: ******* TRY THESE SCI.MATH ********** Will Twentyman (01/24/05)
- Re: ******* TRY THESE SCI.MATH ********** Will Twentyman (01/24/05)
- Re: True = [ proven | provable ] David McAnally (01/24/05)
- Re: AI will never work in 100 years !!!! nobody (01/24/05)
- Re: AI will never work in 100 years !!!! nobody (01/24/05)
- Re: True = [ proven | provable ] |-|erc (01/24/05)
- Re: True = [ proven | provable ] LordBeotian (01/24/05)
- Re: True = [ proven | provable ] |-|erc (01/24/05)
- Re: True = [ proven | provable ] LordBeotian (01/24/05)
- Approximate Eigenvalues John (01/24/05)
- Re: Metaphysics of Potential Infinity Mitch Harris (01/24/05)
- Re: True = [ proven | provable ] Torkel Franzen (01/24/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Torkel Franzen (01/24/05)
- Re: ******* TRY THESE SCI.MATH ********** |-|erc (01/24/05)
- Re: ******* TRY THESE SCI.MATH ********** rupertmccallum_at_yahoo.com (01/24/05)
- Re: Why we cannot compute omega |-|erc (01/24/05)
- Re: ******* TRY THESE SCI.MATH ********** rupertmccallum_at_yahoo.com (01/24/05)
- Re: ******* TRY THESE SCI.MATH ********** |-|erc (01/24/05)
- Re: ******* TRY THESE SCI.MATH ********** |-|erc (01/24/05)
- Re: ******* TRY THESE SCI.MATH ********** rupertmccallum_at_yahoo.com (01/24/05)
- Re: Why we cannot compute omega rupertmccallum_at_yahoo.com (01/24/05)
- Re: ******* TRY THESE SCI.MATH ********** rupertmccallum_at_yahoo.com (01/24/05)
- Re: Why we cannot compute omega |-|erc (01/24/05)
- Re: ******* TRY THESE SCI.MATH ********** rupertmccallum_at_yahoo.com (01/24/05)
- Re: ******* TRY THESE SCI.MATH ********** |-|erc (01/24/05)
- Re: Why we cannot compute omega examachine_at_gmail.com (01/24/05)
- Re: Why we cannot compute omega The Ghost In The Machine (01/24/05)
- Re: ******* TRY THESE SCI.MATH ********** The Ghost In The Machine (01/24/05)
- Re: Why we cannot compute omega |-|erc (01/24/05)
- Re: ******* TRY THESE SCI.MATH ********** |-|erc (01/24/05)
- Re: Why we cannot compute omega rupertmccallum_at_yahoo.com (01/24/05)
- Re: ******* TRY THESE SCI.MATH ********** rupertmccallum_at_yahoo.com (01/24/05)
- Re: ******* TRY THESE SCI.MATH ********** rupertmccallum_at_yahoo.com (01/24/05)
- Re: ******* TRY THESE SCI.MATH ********** |-|erc (01/24/05)
- Re: ******* TRY THESE SCI.MATH ********** rupertmccallum_at_yahoo.com (01/24/05)
- Re: Why we cannot compute omega |-|erc (01/24/05)
- Re: Why we cannot compute omega examachine_at_gmail.com (01/24/05)
- Re: Who introduced Nondeterministic Turing Machine? Thomas A. Li (01/24/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? poopdeville_at_gmail.com (01/24/05)
- Re: True = [ proven | provable ] |-|erc (01/24/05)
- Re: ******* TRY THESE SCI.MATH ********** |-|erc (01/24/05)
- Re: ******* TRY THESE SCI.MATH ********** |-|erc (01/24/05)
- Re: Metaphysics of Potential Infinity r.e.s. (01/24/05)
- Re: True = [ proven | provable ] David McAnally (01/24/05)
- Re: ******* TRY THESE SCI.MATH ********** rupertmccallum_at_yahoo.com (01/23/05)
- Re: AI will never work in 100 years !!!! Kent Paul Dolan (01/23/05)
- Re: AI will never work in 100 years !!!! examachine_at_gmail.com (01/23/05)
- Re: AI will never work in 100 years !!!! examachine_at_gmail.com (01/23/05)
- Re: AI will never work in 100 years !!!! nobody (01/23/05)
- Are current indexing methods too simple? jblanch (01/23/05)
- Is stright indexing taking up too much space? jblanch (01/23/05)
- Re: Metaphysics of Potential Infinity examachine_at_gmail.com (01/23/05)
- Re: Who introduced Nondeterministic Turing Machine? r.e.s. (01/23/05)
- Re: Metaphysics of Potential Infinity r.e.s. (01/23/05)
- Re: AI will never work in 100 years !!!! examachine_at_gmail.com (01/23/05)
- Re: AI will never work in 100 years !!!! nobody (01/23/05)
- Re: ******* TRY THESE SCI.MATH ********** The Ghost In The Machine (01/23/05)
- Re: Who introduced Nondeterministic Turing Machine? examachine_at_gmail.com (01/23/05)
- Who introduced Nondeterministic Turing Machine? Thomas A. Li (01/23/05)
- Re: Metaphysics of Potential Infinity examachine_at_gmail.com (01/23/05)
- Re: ******* TRY THESE SCI.MATH ********** |-|erc (01/23/05)
- Re: ******* TRY THESE SCI.MATH ********** The Ghost In The Machine (01/23/05)
- Re: ******* TRY THESE SCI.MATH ********** |-|erc (01/23/05)
- Re: Metaphysics of Potential Infinity r.e.s. (01/23/05)
- Re: ******* TRY THESE SCI.MATH ********** rupertmccallum_at_yahoo.com (01/23/05)
- Re: Complexity of minimal circuit Scott Aaronson (01/23/05)
- Re: Metaphysics of Potential Infinity examachine_at_gmail.com (01/23/05)
- Re: Metaphysics of Potential Infinity examachine_at_gmail.com (01/23/05)
- Re: ******* TRY THESE SCI.MATH ********** |-|erc (01/23/05)
- Re: Metaphysics of Potential Infinity examachine_at_gmail.com (01/23/05)
- Re: ******* TRY THESE SCI.MATH ********** rupertmccallum_at_yahoo.com (01/23/05)
- Re: WELL WHICH IS IT... ? rupertmccallum_at_yahoo.com (01/23/05)
- Re: Input/Output Cache Systems for the Web yaoziyuan_at_gmail.com (01/22/05)
- Re: Metaphysics of Potential Infinity Barb Knox (01/22/05)
- Re: True = [ proven | provable ] Torkel Franzen (01/22/05)
- Re: True = [ proven | provable ] David McAnally (01/22/05)
- Re: Metaphysics of Potential Infinity Robert Kolker (01/22/05)
- Re: Metaphysics of Potential Infinity examachine_at_gmail.com (01/22/05)
- Why we cannot compute omega |-|erc (01/22/05)
- About Prufer code Joe (01/22/05)
- Re: How many flips of DIAG are on the infintie list of infinite con flippers ? |-|erc (01/22/05)
- Re: How many flips of DIAG are on the infintie list of infinite con flippers ? The Ghost In The Machine (01/22/05)
- Re: two questions about unicyclic graph Matt Timmermans (01/22/05)
- Finding Maximal Clique Edward Wijaya (01/22/05)
- Re: To generate all permutations of length N Rick Decker (01/22/05)
- Re: Input/Output Cache Systems for the Web Yao Ziyuan (01/22/05)
- Input/Output Cache Systems for the Web Yao Ziyuan (01/22/05)
- Re: Infinite number of infinite coin flips Bill Smythe (01/22/05)
- Re: How many flips of DIAG are on the infintie list of infinite con flippers ? |-|erc (01/22/05)
- Re: How many flips of DIAG are on the infintie list of infinite con flippers ? The Ghost In The Machine (01/22/05)
- Re: How many flips of DIAG are on the infintie list of infinite con flippers ? |-|erc (01/22/05)
- Re: Metaphysics of Potential Infinity george (01/22/05)
- Re: WELL WHICH IS IT... ? The Ghost In The Machine (01/22/05)
- Re: How many flips of DIAG are on the infintie list of infinite con flippers ? The Ghost In The Machine (01/22/05)
- Re: How to design a linear algorithm to determine whether two uncyclic graphs are ismophic Richard Harter (01/21/05)
- Re: How to design a linear algorithm to determine whether two uncyclic graphs are ismophic korax1214_at_mailandnews.co.uk (01/21/05)
- Re: To generate all permutations of length N tchow_at_lsa.umich.edu (01/21/05)
- Re: To generate all permutations of length N tchow_at_lsa.umich.edu (01/21/05)
- Re: To generate all permutations of length N mareg_at_mimosa.csv.warwick.ac.uk (01/21/05)
- Re: Metaphysics of Potential Infinity Owen (01/21/05)
- Re: To generate all permutations of length N tchow_at_lsa.umich.edu (01/21/05)
- How to design a linear algorithm to determine whether two uncyclic graphs are ismophic Joe (01/21/05)
- Re: To generate all permutations of length N Yao Ziyuan (01/21/05)
- Re: Metaphysics of Potential Infinity r.e.s. (01/21/05)
- Re: Infinite number of infinite coin flips ken quirici (01/21/05)
- Re: To generate all permutations of length N Jean-Marc Bourguet (01/21/05)
- Re: To generate all permutations of length N Rick Decker (01/21/05)
- Re: Infinite number of infinite coin flips Bill Smythe (01/21/05)
- Re: To generate all permutations of length N Jon Haugsand (01/21/05)
- Re: To generate all permutations of length N yaoziyuan_at_gmail.com (01/21/05)
- To generate all permutations of length N yaoziyuan_at_gmail.com (01/21/05)
- Re: Metaphysics of Potential Infinity Robert Kolker (01/21/05)
- Re: Metaphysics of Potential Infinity exanews_at_gmail.com (01/21/05)
- Re: Metaphysics of Potential Infinity exanews_at_gmail.com (01/21/05)
- Re: Making images - best language? Kent Paul Dolan (01/21/05)
- Sum types darkk_at_wo.cz (01/21/05)
- Re: Making images - best language? Mitch Harris (01/21/05)
- Re: Metaphysics of Potential Infinity Mitch Harris (01/21/05)
- Re: True = [ proven | provable ] LordBeotian (01/21/05)
- Re: Metaphysics of Potential Infinity r.e.s. (01/21/05)
- How far can you move the bar MONOSPACED |-|erc (01/21/05)
- How FAR can I move the BAR |-|erc (01/21/05)
- Re: WELL WHICH IS IT... ? stephen_at_nomail.com (01/21/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? David Bernier (01/21/05)
- Define : X is_on_the_list L to Y many_digits |-|erc (01/21/05)
- Re: How many flips of DIAG are on the infintie list of infinite con flippers ? |-|erc (01/21/05)
- Re: WELL WHICH IS IT... ? The Ghost In The Machine (01/21/05)
- Re: How many flips of DIAG are on the infintie list of infinite con flippers ? The Ghost In The Machine (01/21/05)
- Re: "A random real number will be on a computables list to an infinite number of digits" The Ghost In The Machine (01/21/05)
- Re: Making images - best language? Mark Carroll (01/21/05)
- Metaphysics of Potential Infinity exanews_at_gmail.com (01/21/05)
- Re: WELL WHICH IS IT... ? |-|erc (01/21/05)
- Re: WELL WHICH IS IT... ? Will Twentyman (01/21/05)
- Re: HERC 97 SCI.MATH 0 Will Twentyman (01/21/05)
- Re: WELL WHICH IS IT... ? |-|erc (01/21/05)
- Re: WELL WHICH IS IT... ? rupertmccallum_at_yahoo.com (01/21/05)
- Re: How many flips of DIAG are on the infintie list of infinite con flippers ? |-|erc (01/21/05)
- Re: "A random real number will be on a computables list to an infinite number of digits" |-|erc (01/21/05)
- WELL WHICH IS IT... ? |-|erc (01/21/05)
- Re: ******* TRY THESE SCI.MATH ********** |-|erc (01/21/05)
- Re: HERC 97 SCI.MATH 0 |-|erc (01/21/05)
- Re: How many flips of DIAG are on the infintie list of infinite con flippers ? rupertmccallum_at_yahoo.com (01/21/05)
- Making images - best language? yeahright_at_sitandspin.com (01/21/05)
- Re: little-oh newstome_at_comcast.net (01/20/05)
- Re: HERC 97 SCI.MATH 0 Will Twentyman (01/20/05)
- Re: ******* TRY THESE SCI.MATH ********** Will Twentyman (01/20/05)
- Re: atoi Martin Johansen (01/20/05)
- Re: Follow-up Bryan Olson (01/20/05)
- Re: "A random real number will be on a computables list to an infinite number of digits" George Cox (01/20/05)
- atoi puzzlecracker (01/20/05)
- Re: Follow-up tcne (01/20/05)
- Re: ******* TRY THESE SCI.MATH ********** abe.buckingham_at_gmail.com (01/20/05)
- Re: "A random real number will be on a computables list to an infinite number of digits" Will Twentyman (01/20/05)
- atoi puzzlecracker (01/20/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Chris Menzel (01/20/05)
- Re: HERC 97 SCI.MATH 0 ken quirici (01/20/05)
- Re: How many digits is pi computable to? Ken Johnson (01/20/05)
- Re: How many flips of DIAG are on the infintie list of infinite con flippers ? The Ghost In The Machine (01/20/05)
- Re: HERC 97 SCI.MATH 0 The Ghost In The Machine (01/20/05)
- Re: ******* TRY THESE SCI.MATH ********** The Ghost In The Machine (01/20/05)
- Re: ******* TRY THESE SCI.MATH ********** The Ghost In The Machine (01/20/05)
- Re: "A random real number will be on a computables list to an infinite number of digits" The Ghost In The Machine (01/20/05)
- Re: "A random real number will be on a computables list to an infinite number of digits" The Ghost In The Machine (01/20/05)
- Re: Who can prove Boruvka's algorithm ? J.H.Jongejan (01/20/05)
- Re: Complexity of minimal circuit Daniel A. Jimenez (01/20/05)
- Re: riddles array sandey (01/20/05)
- Re: bound on number of shortest paths in a undirected & unweighted graph sandey (01/20/05)
- Re: bound on number of shortest paths in a undirected & unweighted graph sandey (01/20/05)
- Re: riddles array Torben Ćgidius Mogensen (01/20/05)
- Complexity of minimal circuit Roderick Bloem (01/20/05)
- Re: Quest For The Minimal Instruction Set Torben Ćgidius Mogensen (01/20/05)
- Re: True = [ proven | provable ] |-|erc (01/20/05)
- Re: True = [ proven | provable ] |-|erc (01/20/05)
- Re: True = [ proven | provable ] LordBeotian (01/20/05)
- Re: ******* TRY THESE SCI.MATH ********** |-|erc (01/20/05)
- Re: ******* TRY THESE SCI.MATH ********** Lasse (01/20/05)
- HERC 97 SCI.MATH 0 |-|erc (01/20/05)
- Re: True = [ proven | provable ] Ogie Oglethorpe (01/20/05)
- Re: ******* TRY THESE SCI.MATH ********** |-|erc (01/20/05)
- Quest For The Minimal Instruction Set sytelus_at_yahoo.com (01/20/05)
- Re: ******* TRY THESE SCI.MATH ********** rupertmccallum_at_yahoo.com (01/20/05)
- Follow-up tcne (01/20/05)
- ******* TRY THESE SCI.MATH ********** |-|erc (01/20/05)
- Re: True = [ proven | provable ] |-|erc (01/20/05)
- Re: True = [ proven | provable ] George Cox (01/20/05)
- Re: "A random real number will be on a computables list to an infinite number of digits" |-|erc (01/20/05)
- Re: "A random real number will be on a computables list to an infinite number of digits" George Cox (01/20/05)
- Re: How many flips of DIAG are on the infintie list of infinite con flippers ? |-|erc (01/20/05)
- Re: How many flips of DIAG are on the infintie list of infinite con flippers ? rupertmccallum_at_yahoo.com (01/20/05)
- Re: True = [ proven | provable ] |-|erc (01/20/05)
- Re: True = [ proven | provable ] George Cox (01/20/05)
- riddles array puzzlecracker (01/20/05)
- "A random real number will be on a computables list to an infinite number of digits" |-|erc (01/20/05)
- Re: Why NP Problem is Important and Practical Examples r.e.s. (01/20/05)
- Re: VVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVV |-|erc (01/20/05)
- Re: I HEARBY CLAIM THE SYMBOL oo TO REFER TO UNCOUNTABLE INFINITY |-|erc (01/20/05)
- Re: How many flips of DIAG are on the infintie list of infinite con flippers ? |-|erc (01/20/05)
- Re: VVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVV David Ames (01/20/05)
- Re: How many flips of DIAG are on the infintie list of infinite con flippers? |-|erc (01/20/05)
- Re: True = [ proven | provable ] |-|erc (01/20/05)
- Re: True = [ proven | provable ] |-|erc (01/20/05)
- Re: bound on number of shortest paths in a undirected & unweighted graph David Wagner (01/20/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? tchow_at_lsa.umich.edu (01/20/05)
- Re: True = [ proven | provable ] George Cox (01/20/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Torkel Franzen (01/19/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? poopdeville_at_gmail.com (01/19/05)
- LL TO BST puzzlecracker (01/19/05)
- Re: How many flips of DIAG are on the infintie list of infinite con flippers? Termite of Tempation (01/19/05)
- Re: I HEARBY CLAIM THE SYMBOL oo TO REFER TO UNCOUNTABLE INFINITY Termite of Tempation (01/19/05)
- Re: I HEARBY CLAIM THE SYMBOL oo TO REFER TO UNCOUNTABLE INFINITY Termite of Tempation (01/19/05)
- Re: little-oh Andersen (01/19/05)
- Re: Infinite number of infinite coin flips Ed Murphy (01/19/05)
- Re: I HEARBY CLAIM THE SYMBOL oo TO REFER TO UNCOUNTABLE INFINITY Will Twentyman (01/19/05)
- Re: How many flips of DIAG are on the infintie list of infinite con flippers? Will Twentyman (01/19/05)
- Re: How many digits is pi computable to? Will Twentyman (01/19/05)
- Re: Infinite number of infinite coin flips Matthew Russotto (01/19/05)
- Re: How to compare O(log(d,n)) and O(n^(1/d)) Ajoy K Thamattoor (01/19/05)
- Who can prove Boruvka's algorithm ? Joe (01/19/05)
- Re: How many digits is pi computable to? Scott Dorsey (01/19/05)
- Re: little-oh Lars Engebretsen (01/19/05)
- Infinite number of infinite coin flips Bill Smythe (01/19/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Kenneth Doyle (01/19/05)
- Re: I HEARBY CLAIM THE SYMBOL oo TO REFER TO UNCOUNTABLE INFINITY Aso Merapi (01/19/05)
- Re: little-oh Andersen (01/19/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? tchow_at_lsa.umich.edu (01/19/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? tchow_at_lsa.umich.edu (01/19/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Mitch Harris (01/19/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Mitch Harris (01/19/05)
- Re: How many flips of DIAG are on the infintie list of infinite con flippers ? The Ghost In The Machine (01/19/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? tchow_at_lsa.umich.edu (01/19/05)
- Re: little-oh Lars Engebretsen (01/19/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Kenneth Doyle (01/19/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Torkel Franzen (01/19/05)
- Re: little-oh mareg_at_mimosa.csv.warwick.ac.uk (01/19/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Ralph Hartley (01/19/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Mitch Harris (01/19/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Mitch Harris (01/19/05)
- Re: I HEARBY CLAIM THE SYMBOL oo TO REFER TO UNCOUNTABLE INFINITY bryant_j_j_at_yahoo.com (01/19/05)
- Re: I HEARBY CLAIM THE SYMBOL oo TO REFER TO UNCOUNTABLE INFINITY |-|erc (01/19/05)
- Re: VVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVV VVVVVVVV bryant_j_j_at_yahoo.com (01/19/05)
- Re: VVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVV VVVVVVVV bryant_j_j_at_yahoo.com (01/19/05)
- Re: I HEARBY CLAIM THE SYMBOL oo TO REFER TO UNCOUNTABLE INFINITY bryant_j_j_at_yahoo.com (01/19/05)
- Re: True = [ proven | provable ] LordBeotian (01/19/05)
- I HEARBY CLAIM THE SYMBOL oo TO REFER TO UNCOUNTABLE INFINITY |-|erc (01/19/05)
- Re: How many digits is pi computable to? |-|erc (01/19/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Kenneth Doyle (01/19/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Daryl McCullough (01/19/05)
- Re: How many digits is pi computable to? Kent Paul Dolan (01/19/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? poopdeville_at_gmail.com (01/19/05)
- Re: bound on number of shortest paths in a undirected & unweighted graph sandey (01/19/05)
- Re: How many digits is pi computable to? |-|erc (01/19/05)
- Re: little-oh Lars Engebretsen (01/19/05)
- Re: little-oh Mitch Harris (01/19/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Mitch Harris (01/19/05)
- Re: Why NP Problem is Important and Practical Examples examachine_at_gmail.com (01/19/05)
- Re: little-oh Andersen (01/19/05)
- Re: True = [ proven | provable ] LordBeotian (01/19/05)
- Re: little-oh Mitch Harris (01/19/05)
- Re: How many digits is pi computable to? Ed Murphy (01/19/05)
- Re: How many flips of DIAG are on the infintie list of infinite con flippers ? |-|erc (01/19/05)
- Re: How many flips of DIAG are on the infintie list of infinite con flippers ? rupertmccallum_at_yahoo.com (01/19/05)
- How many flips of DIAG are on the infintie list of infinite con flippers ? |-|erc (01/19/05)
- Re: How many flips of DIAG are on the infintie list of infinite con flippers? |-|erc (01/19/05)
- Nuisance by |-|erc who has flipped out: Re: How many flips of DIAG are on the infintie list of infinite con flippers? bryant_j_j_at_yahoo.com (01/19/05)
- little-oh Andersen (01/19/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Torkel Franzen (01/19/05)
- How many flips of DIAG are on the infintie list of infinite con flippers? |-|erc (01/19/05)
- Re: How many digits is pi computable to? |-|erc (01/19/05)
- Re: How many digits is pi computable to? Ed Murphy (01/19/05)
- centre of graph Joe (01/19/05)
- Re: How many digits is pi computable to? |-|erc (01/19/05)
- Re: How many digits is pi computable to? Kent Paul Dolan (01/19/05)
- Re: Why NP Problem is Important and Practical Examples r.e.s. (01/19/05)
- Re: *** The string is on_the_list TO_INFINITE_DIGITS is NOT incomprehensible *** Mike Oliver (01/19/05)
- Re: bound on number of shortest paths in a undirected & unweighted graph David Wagner (01/19/05)
- Re: True = [ proven | provable ] |-|erc (01/19/05)
- Re: Why NP Problem is Important and Practical Examples r.e.s. (01/19/05)
- Re: How to compare O(log(d,n)) and O(n^(1/d)) gcrhoads_at_yahoo.com (01/19/05)
- Re: Why NP Problem is Important and Practical Examples examachine_at_gmail.com (01/19/05)
- Re: Why NP Problem is Important and Practical Examples examachine_at_gmail.com (01/19/05)
- Re: Why NP Problem is Important and Practical Examples examachine_at_gmail.com (01/19/05)
- Re: True = [ proven | provable ] examachine_at_gmail.com (01/19/05)
- Re: Smaller UTM than Rule110 Kenneth Doyle (01/19/05)
- Re: How many digits is pi computable to? Kent Paul Dolan (01/19/05)
- Re: Why NP Problem is Important and Practical Examples r.e.s. (01/19/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Kenneth Doyle (01/19/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? tchow_at_lsa.umich.edu (01/19/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Ralph Hartley (01/18/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Mitch Harris (01/18/05)
- Re: In case you studied the GOTO theoretical language... David Moews (01/18/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? examachine_at_gmail.com (01/18/05)
- How to compare O(log(d,n)) and O(n^(1/d)) Leon (01/18/05)
- Re: Why NP Problem is Important and Practical Examples examachine_at_gmail.com (01/18/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Ajoy K Thamattoor (01/18/05)
- Re: True = [ proven | provable ] LordBeotian (01/18/05)
- Re: *** The string is on_the_list TO_INFINITE_DIGITS is NOT incomprehensible *** Prai Jei (01/18/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? tchow_at_lsa.umich.edu (01/18/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? tchow_at_lsa.umich.edu (01/18/05)
- Re: *** The string is on_the_list TO_INFINITE_DIGITS is NOT incomprehensible *** John Savard (01/18/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Chris Menzel (01/18/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Mitch Harris (01/18/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Mitch Harris (01/18/05)
- Re: How many digits is pi computable to? r.e.s. (01/18/05)
- Re: How many digits is pi computable to? Matthew Russotto (01/18/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? tchow_at_lsa.umich.edu (01/18/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? tchow_at_lsa.umich.edu (01/18/05)
- bound on number of shortest paths in a undirected & unweighted graph les_ander_at_yahoo.com (01/18/05)
- Re: *** The string is on_the_list TO_INFINITE_DIGITS is NOT incomprehensible *** Mike Oliver (01/18/05)
- Re: *** The string is on_the_list TO_INFINITE_DIGITS is NOT incomprehensible *** John Savard (01/18/05)
- Re: How many digits is pi computable to? Dave Seaman (01/18/05)
- Re: How many digits is pi computable to? Gareth Owen (01/18/05)
- Re: How many digits is pi computable to? Matthew Russotto (01/18/05)
- Re: How many digits is pi computable to? |-|erc (01/18/05)
- *** The string is on_the_list TO_INFINITE_DIGITS is NOT incomprehensible *** |-|erc (01/18/05)
- Re: How many digits is pi computable to? nikolai kingsley (01/18/05)
- Re: True = [ proven | provable ] |-|erc (01/18/05)
- Re: True = [ proven | provable ] LordBeotian (01/18/05)
- Re: two questions about unicyclic graph sandey (01/18/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Daryl McCullough (01/18/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Aatu Koskensilta (01/18/05)
- Re: True = [ proven | provable ] Torkel Franzen (01/18/05)
- Re: True = [ proven | provable ] David McAnally (01/18/05)
- Re: How many digits is pi computable to? |-|erc (01/18/05)
- Re: How many digits is pi computable to? |-|erc (01/18/05)
- Re: How many digits is pi computable to? Kent Paul Dolan (01/18/05)
- Re: How many digits is pi computable to? Ed Murphy (01/18/05)
- Re: Winning Ways: NP-hardness question Mitch Harris (01/18/05)
- Re: How many digits is pi computable to? |-|erc (01/18/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Torkel Franzen (01/18/05)
- Re: How many digits is pi computable to? Ed Murphy (01/18/05)
- Re: True = [ proven | provable ] |-|erc (01/18/05)
- Re: How many digits is pi computable to? |-|erc (01/18/05)
- Re: Idiocy of Muckenheim was Re: countability of reals |-|erc (01/18/05)
- Re: How many digits is pi computable to? Ed Murphy (01/18/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Ajoy K Thamattoor (01/18/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Torkel Franzen (01/18/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Ajoy K Thamattoor (01/18/05)
- Re: Idiocy of Muckenheim was Re: countability of reals Piotr Sawuk (01/18/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Torkel Franzen (01/18/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Ajoy K Thamattoor (01/18/05)
- Re: How many digits is pi computable to? |-|erc (01/18/05)
- Re: How many digits is pi computable to? |-|erc (01/18/05)
- Re: How many digits is pi computable to? |-|erc (01/18/05)
- Re: How many digits is pi computable to? |-|erc (01/18/05)
- Re: True = [ proven | provable ] |-|erc (01/18/05)
- random eulerian circuit tour Ken (01/18/05)
- Re: How many digits is pi computable to? r.e.s. (01/18/05)
- Re: True = [ proven | provable ] Ogie Ogelthorpe (01/18/05)
- Re: How many digits is pi computable to? Michael Mendelsohn (01/17/05)
- Re: How many digits is pi computable to? Barb Knox (01/17/05)
- Re: Idiocy of Muckenheim was Re: countability of reals Will Twentyman (01/17/05)
- Re: How many digits is pi computable to? Don Del Grande (01/17/05)
- Re: True = [ proven | provable ] George Cox (01/17/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? examachine_at_gmail.com (01/17/05)
- Re: How many digits is pi computable to? Bill Smythe (01/17/05)
- Re: How many digits is pi computable to? Michael Mendelsohn (01/17/05)
- Re: True = [ proven | provable ] Lysander (01/17/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? namducnguyen (01/17/05)
- Re: How many digits is pi computable to? Bill Smythe (01/17/05)
- Re: How many digits is pi computable to? Bill Smythe (01/17/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Alan Smaill (01/17/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Torkel Franzen (01/17/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Mitch Harris (01/17/05)
- two questions about unicyclic graph Joe (01/17/05)
- Re: advise on math course taati_at_dpir.com (01/17/05)
- Re: True = [ proven | provable ] David McAnally (01/17/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Torkel Franzen (01/17/05)
- Re: True = [ proven | provable ] John Savard (01/17/05)
- Re: True = [ proven | provable ] |-|erc (01/17/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Mitch Harris (01/17/05)
- Re: True = [ proven | provable ] |-|erc (01/17/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Aatu Koskensilta (01/17/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Torkel Franzen (01/17/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Mitch Harris (01/17/05)
- Re: True = [ proven | provable ] Lars Kecke (01/17/05)
- Re: True = [ proven | provable ] Ogie Ogelthorpe (01/17/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Mitch Harris (01/17/05)
- Re: usenet kooks and a crank scale Aatu Koskensilta (01/17/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Torkel Franzen (01/17/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Mitch Harris (01/17/05)
- Re: Closer and closer you move to the Cantorian cliff |-|erc (01/17/05)
- Re: Closer and closer you move to the Cantorian cliff John Savard (01/17/05)
- True = [ proven | provable ] |-|erc (01/17/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? tchow_at_lsa.umich.edu (01/17/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? tchow_at_lsa.umich.edu (01/17/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? tchow_at_lsa.umich.edu (01/17/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? tchow_at_lsa.umich.edu (01/17/05)
- Re: finding ALL shortest paths from i to j (not All pair shortest paths) David Wagner (01/17/05)
- CFP: SAT 2005 (2nd CFP) Toby Walsh (01/17/05)
- advise on math course scottW (01/17/05)
- Re: usenet kooks and a crank scale |-|erc (01/17/05)
- Re: Closer and closer you move to the Cantorian cliff |-|erc (01/17/05)
- WADS 2005 Call for papers Alex Lopez-Ortiz (01/16/05)
- Re: Closer and closer you move to the Cantorian cliff tinyurl.com/uh3t (01/16/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Jeffrey Ketland (01/16/05)
- Re: Why NP Problem is Important and Practical Examples r.e.s. (01/16/05)
- Re: Why NP Problem is Important and Practical Examples Rick Decker (01/16/05)
- Re: usenet kooks and a crank scale Aatu Koskensilta (01/16/05)
- Re: finding ALL shortest paths from i to j (not All pair shortest paths) el goog (01/16/05)
- In case you studied the GOTO theoretical language... THE SWARM MASTER (01/16/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Torkel Franzen (01/16/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Mitch Harris (01/16/05)
- Re: finding ALL shortest paths from i to j (not All pair shortest paths) sandey (01/16/05)
- Re: Wanted: Nondeterministic Turing Machine of Polynomial Time Complexity Alex Vinokur (01/16/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? LordBeotian (01/16/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? LordBeotian (01/16/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? examachine_at_gmail.com (01/16/05)
- Re: Why NP Problem is Important and Practical Examples examachine_at_gmail.com (01/16/05)
- Re: Easy question: WHICH LIST CONTAINS MORE DIGITS OF Pi? Vince (01/16/05)
- Re: usenet kooks and a crank scale |-|erc (01/16/05)
- Re: usenet kooks and a crank scale Aatu Koskensilta (01/16/05)
- Re: Closer and closer you move to the Cantorian cliff george (01/16/05)
- Re: Closer and closer you move to the Cantorian cliff george (01/16/05)
- Re: Closer and closer you move to the Cantorian cliff |-|erc (01/16/05)
- Re: Closer and closer you move to the Cantorian cliff bryant_j_j_at_yahoo.com (01/16/05)
- Re: Closer and closer you move to the Cantorian cliff tinyurl.com/uh3t (01/16/05)
- Re: finding ALL shortest paths from i to j (not All pair shortest paths) les_ander_at_yahoo.com (01/16/05)
- Re: usenet kooks and a crank scale |-|erc (01/16/05)
- Re: finding ALL shortest paths from i to j (not All pair shortest paths) sandey (01/16/05)
- finding ALL shortest paths from i to j (not All pair shortest paths) les_ander_at_yahoo.com (01/15/05)
- Re: Why NP Problem is Important and Practical Examples Rick Decker (01/15/05)
- Re: usenet kooks and a crank scale Aatu Koskensilta (01/15/05)
- Re: usenet kooks and a crank scale |-|erc (01/15/05)
- Re: usenet kooks and a crank scale Aatu Koskensilta (01/15/05)
- Re: usenet kooks and a crank scale |-|erc (01/15/05)
- Re: SCRATCH SCRATCH WHY YOU ALL HATE ME NOW? examachine_at_gmail.com (01/15/05)
- Re: Towards disproof of Omega examachine_at_gmail.com (01/15/05)
- Re: usenet kooks and a crank scale |-|erc (01/15/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Torkel Franzen (01/15/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? poopdeville_at_gmail.com (01/15/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Torkel Franzen (01/15/05)
- Re: SCRATCH SCRATCH WHY YOU ALL HATE ME NOW? bryant_j_j_at_yahoo.com (01/15/05)
- Re: SCRATCH SCRATCH WHY YOU ALL HATE ME NOW? alex goldman (01/15/05)
- Re: SCRATCH SCRATCH WHY YOU ALL HATE ME NOW? alex goldman (01/15/05)
- Re: SCRATCH SCRATCH WHY YOU ALL HATE ME NOW? |-|erc (01/15/05)
- Re: SCRATCH SCRATCH WHY YOU ALL HATE ME NOW? alex goldman (01/15/05)
- Closer and closer you move to the Cantorian cliff |-|erc (01/15/05)
- Re: Why NP Problem is Important and Practical Examples jrefactors_at_hotmail.com (01/15/05)
- Re: SCRATCH SCRATCH WHY YOU ALL HATE ME NOW? |-|erc (01/15/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? poopdeville_at_gmail.com (01/15/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Josh Purinton (01/15/05)
- Re: Towards disproof of Omega |-|erc (01/14/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Torkel Franzen (01/14/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Alan Smaill (01/14/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Torkel Franzen (01/14/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Torkel Franzen (01/14/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Alan Smaill (01/14/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Torkel Franzen (01/14/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Ralph Hartley (01/14/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Torkel Franzen (01/14/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Alan Smaill (01/14/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Mitch Harris (01/14/05)
- Re: Towards disproof of Omega examachine_at_gmail.com (01/14/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Torkel Franzen (01/14/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Mitch Harris (01/14/05)
- Re: Kolmogorov? Przemyslaw Wesolek (01/14/05)
- Re: Fast arrays Przemyslaw Wesolek (01/14/05)
- Re: SCRATCH SCRATCH WHY YOU ALL HATE ME NOW? alex goldman (01/14/05)
- Re: Why NP Problem is Important and Practical Examples Christoph M. Wintersteiger (01/14/05)
- Re: SCRATCH SCRATCH WHY YOU ALL HATE ME NOW? |-|erc (01/14/05)
- Re: SCRATCH SCRATCH WHY YOU ALL HATE ME NOW? alex goldman (01/14/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Torkel Franzen (01/14/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Mitch Harris (01/14/05)
- Re: Towards disproof of Omega |-|erc (01/14/05)
- Re: Towards disproof of Omega examachine_at_gmail.com (01/14/05)
- Re: Towards disproof of Omega examachine_at_gmail.com (01/14/05)
- Re: SCRATCH SCRATCH WHY YOU ALL HATE ME NOW? |-|erc (01/14/05)
- Re: SCRATCH SCRATCH WHY YOU ALL HATE ME NOW? poopdeville_at_gmail.com (01/14/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? poopdeville_at_gmail.com (01/14/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Torkel Franzen (01/14/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? poopdeville_at_gmail.com (01/14/05)
- Re: SCRATCH SCRATCH WHY YOU ALL HATE ME NOW? |-|erc (01/14/05)
- Re: SCRATCH SCRATCH WHY YOU ALL HATE ME NOW? poopdeville_at_gmail.com (01/14/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Jeffrey Ketland (01/14/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? namducnguyen (01/14/05)
- Re: Towards disproof of Omega Kate Orman (01/14/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Jeffrey Ketland (01/14/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? tchow_at_lsa.umich.edu (01/14/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? tchow_at_lsa.umich.edu (01/14/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? tchow_at_lsa.umich.edu (01/14/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Torkel Franzen (01/14/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? namducnguyen (01/14/05)
- SCRATCH SCRATCH WHY YOU ALL HATE ME NOW? |-|erc (01/14/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? tchow_at_lsa.umich.edu (01/14/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? tchow_at_lsa.umich.edu (01/14/05)
- Re: Idiocy of Muckenheim was Re: countability of reals |-|erc (01/14/05)
- Re: Idiocy of Muckenheim was Re: countability of reals bryant_j_j_at_yahoo.com (01/14/05)
- Re: Idiocy of Muckenheim was Re: countability of reals |-|erc (01/14/05)
- Re: Idiocy of Muckenheim was Re: countability of reals |-|erc (01/14/05)
- Re: Towards disproof of Omega Kent Paul Dolan (01/14/05)
- Re: Idiocy of Muckenheim was Re: countability of reals Will Twentyman (01/14/05)
- Re: Idiocy of Muckenheim was Re: countability of reals bryant_j_j_at_yahoo.com (01/14/05)
- Re: Idiocy of Muckenheim was Re: countability of reals |-|erc (01/14/05)
- Re: Idiocy of Muckenheim was Re: countability of reals Will Twentyman (01/14/05)
- Re: Idiocy of Muckenheim was Re: countability of reals |-|erc (01/14/05)
- Re: Idiocy of Muckenheim was Re: countability of reals bryant_j_j_at_yahoo.com (01/14/05)
- Re: Idiocy of Muckenheim was Re: countability of reals |-|erc (01/14/05)
- Re: Idiocy of Muckenheim was Re: countability of reals bryant_j_j_at_yahoo.com (01/14/05)
- Re: Idiocy of Muckenheim was Re: countability of reals |-|erc (01/14/05)
- Re: Idiocy of Muckenheim was Re: countability of reals bryant_j_j_at_yahoo.com (01/14/05)
- Re: another moron Re: John misses point Re: FUCKING RUDE CHAP Re: Idiocy of Muckenheim was Re: countability of reals |-|erc (01/14/05)
- Re: another moron Re: John misses point Re: FUCKING RUDE CHAP Re: Idiocy of Muckenheim was Re: countability of reals bryant_j_j_at_yahoo.com (01/14/05)
- Re: another moron Re: John misses point Re: FUCKING RUDE CHAP Re: Idiocy of Muckenheim was Re: countability of reals |-|erc (01/14/05)
- Re: another moron Re: John misses point Re: FUCKING RUDE CHAP Re: Idiocy of Muckenheim was Re: countability of reals bryant_j_j_at_yahoo.com (01/14/05)
- Re: another moron Re: John misses point Re: FUCKING RUDE CHAP Re: Idiocy of Muckenheim was Re: countability of reals bryant_j_j_at_yahoo.com (01/14/05)
- Re: Towards disproof of Omega |-|erc (01/14/05)
- Re: another moron Re: John misses point Re: FUCKING RUDE CHAP Re: Idiocy of Muckenheim was Re: countability of reals bryant_j_j_at_yahoo.com (01/14/05)
- Re: another moron Re: John misses point Re: FUCKING RUDE CHAP Re: Idiocy of Muckenheim was Re: countability of reals Lady Chatterly (01/14/05)
- Re: Towards disproof of Omega examachine_at_gmail.com (01/13/05)
- Re: Towards disproof of Omega examachine_at_gmail.com (01/13/05)
- Re: Tree Automata Intersection Algorithm XMLGuy (01/13/05)
- Re: Fast arrays Paul E. Black (01/13/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Ralph Hartley (01/13/05)
- Re: Number System Will Twentyman (01/13/05)
- Re: Why NP Problem is Important and Practical Examples Thomas A. Li (01/13/05)
- Is this hash function Universal? John (01/13/05)
- Re: another moron Re: John misses point Re: FUCKING RUDE CHAP Re: Idiocy of Muckenheim was Re: countability of reals The Ghost In The Machine (01/13/05)
- Re: Metatopic: newsgroups vs. blogs |-|erc (01/13/05)
- Re: another moron Re: John misses point Re: FUCKING RUDE CHAP Re: Idiocy of Muckenheim was Re: countability of reals |-|erc (01/13/05)
- Re: another moron Re: John misses point Re: FUCKING RUDE CHAP Re: Idiocy of Muckenheim was Re: countability of reals bryant_j_j_at_yahoo.com (01/13/05)
- Re: another moron Re: John misses point Re: FUCKING RUDE CHAP Re: Idiocy of Muckenheim was Re: countability of reals |-|erc (01/13/05)
- Re: another moron Re: John misses point Re: FUCKING RUDE CHAP Re: Idiocy of Muckenheim was Re: countability of reals bryant_j_j_at_yahoo.com (01/13/05)
- Metatopic: newsgroups vs. blogs Mitch Harris (01/13/05)
- Re: another moron Re: John misses point Re: FUCKING RUDE CHAP Re: Idiocy of Muckenheim was Re: countability of reals |-|erc (01/13/05)
- Re: another moron Re: John misses point Re: FUCKING RUDE CHAP Re: Idiocy of Muckenheim was Re: countability of reals bryant_j_j_at_yahoo.com (01/13/05)
- Re: another moron Re: John misses point Re: FUCKING RUDE CHAP Re: Idiocy of Muckenheim was Re: countability of reals |-|erc (01/13/05)
- Re: another moron Re: John misses point Re: FUCKING RUDE CHAP Re: Idiocy of Muckenheim was Re: countability of reals bryant_j_j_at_yahoo.com (01/13/05)
- Re: another moron Re: John misses point Re: FUCKING RUDE CHAP Re: Idiocy of Muckenheim was Re: countability of reals |-|erc (01/13/05)
- Re: another moron Re: John misses point Re: FUCKING RUDE CHAP Re: Idiocy of Muckenheim was Re: countability of reals bryant_j_j_at_yahoo.com (01/13/05)
- Re: another moron Re: John misses point Re: FUCKING RUDE CHAP Re: Idiocy of Muckenheim was Re: countability of reals |-|erc (01/13/05)
- Re: another moron Re: John misses point Re: FUCKING RUDE CHAP Re: Idiocy of Muckenheim was Re: countability of reals bryant_j_j_at_yahoo.com (01/13/05)
- Re: another moron Re: John misses point Re: FUCKING RUDE CHAP Re: Idiocy of Muckenheim was Re: countability of reals |-|erc (01/13/05)
- Re: another moron Re: John misses point Re: FUCKING RUDE CHAP Re: Idiocy of Muckenheim was Re: countability of reals bryant_j_j_at_yahoo.com (01/13/05)
- Re: another moron Re: John misses point Re: FUCKING RUDE CHAP Re: Idiocy of Muckenheim was Re: countability of reals bryant_j_j_at_yahoo.com (01/13/05)
- Re: another moron Re: John misses point Re: FUCKING RUDE CHAP Re: Idiocy of Muckenheim was Re: countability of reals |-|erc (01/13/05)
- Re: another moron Re: John misses point Re: FUCKING RUDE CHAP Re: Idiocy of Muckenheim was Re: countability of reals bryant_j_j_at_yahoo.com (01/13/05)
- Re: another moron Re: John misses point Re: FUCKING RUDE CHAP Re: Idiocy of Muckenheim was Re: countability of reals |-|erc (01/13/05)
- Re: another moron Re: John misses point Re: FUCKING RUDE CHAP Re: Idiocy of Muckenheim was Re: countability of reals bryant_j_j_at_yahoo.com (01/13/05)
- Re: another moron Re: John misses point Re: FUCKING RUDE CHAP Re: Idiocy of Muckenheim was Re: countability of reals |-|erc (01/13/05)
- Re: another moron Re: John misses point Re: FUCKING RUDE CHAP Re: Idiocy of Muckenheim was Re: countability of reals bryant_j_j_at_yahoo.com (01/13/05)
- Re: another moron Re: John misses point Re: FUCKING RUDE CHAP Re: Idiocy of Muckenheim was Re: countability of reals |-|erc (01/13/05)
- Re: another moron Re: John misses point Re: FUCKING RUDE CHAP Re: Idiocy of Muckenheim was Re: countability of reals bryant_j_j_at_yahoo.com (01/13/05)
- Re: another moron Re: John misses point Re: FUCKING RUDE CHAP Re: Idiocy of Muckenheim was Re: countability of reals |-|erc (01/13/05)
- Re: another moron Re: John misses point Re: FUCKING RUDE CHAP Re: Idiocy of Muckenheim was Re: countability of reals |-|erc (01/13/05)
- Re: another moron Re: John misses point Re: FUCKING RUDE CHAP Re: Idiocy of Muckenheim was Re: countability of reals bryant_j_j_at_yahoo.com (01/13/05)
- another moron Re: John misses point Re: FUCKING RUDE CHAP Re: Idiocy of Muckenheim was Re: countability of reals |-|erc (01/13/05)
- Re: John misses point Re: FUCKING RUDE CHAP Re: Idiocy of Muckenheim was Re: countability of reals bryant_j_j_at_yahoo.com (01/13/05)
- Re: John misses point Re: FUCKING RUDE CHAP Re: Idiocy of Muckenheim was Re: countability of reals |-|erc (01/13/05)
- Re: John misses point Re: FUCKING RUDE CHAP Re: Idiocy of Muckenheim was Re: countability of reals bryant_j_j_at_yahoo.com (01/13/05)
- Re: John misses point Re: FUCKING RUDE CHAP Re: Idiocy of Muckenheim was Re: countability of reals bryant_j_j_at_yahoo.com (01/13/05)
- Re: John misses point Re: FUCKING RUDE CHAP Re: Idiocy of Muckenheim was Re: countability of reals |-|erc (01/13/05)
- Re: Lower bound analysis, question Smalmatskungen (01/13/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Torkel Franzen (01/13/05)
- Re: John misses point Re: FUCKING RUDE CHAP Re: Idiocy of Muckenheim was Re: countability of reals bryant_j_j_at_yahoo.com (01/13/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Torkel Franzen (01/13/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Torkel Franzen (01/13/05)
- Re: John misses point Re: FUCKING RUDE CHAP Re: Idiocy of Muckenheim was Re: countability of reals |-|erc (01/13/05)
- Re: Lower bound analysis, question Rick Decker (01/13/05)
- Re: Lower bound analysis, question Rick Decker (01/13/05)
- Re: Lower bound analysis, question stephen_at_nomail.com (01/13/05)
- Re: Lower bound analysis, question Rick Decker (01/13/05)
- Re: Lower bound analysis, question Smalmatskungen (01/13/05)
- Re: Fast arrays Rick Decker (01/13/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Jeffrey Ketland (01/13/05)
- Re: Lower bound analysis, question Colin Andrew Percival (01/13/05)
- Re: The hyper-infinity believers friendly question |-|erc (01/13/05)
- Re: Fast arrays examachine_at_gmail.com (01/13/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Barb Knox (01/13/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? LordBeotian (01/13/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Barb Knox (01/13/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Ralph Hartley (01/13/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? LordBeotian (01/12/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Ralph Hartley (01/12/05)
- Re: Winning Ways: NP-hardness question David Moews (01/12/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Ralph Hartley (01/12/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? tchow_at_lsa.umich.edu (01/12/05)
- Lower bound analysis, question Smalmatskungen (01/12/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Daryl McCullough (01/12/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Barb Knox (01/12/05)
- Re: Winning Ways: NP-hardness question tchow_at_lsa.umich.edu (01/12/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? tchow_at_lsa.umich.edu (01/12/05)
- Re: Number System stephen_at_nomail.com (01/12/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? tchow_at_lsa.umich.edu (01/12/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Ralph Hartley (01/12/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? tchow_at_lsa.umich.edu (01/12/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? tchow_at_lsa.umich.edu (01/12/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? tchow_at_lsa.umich.edu (01/12/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Dave Seaman (01/12/05)
- Re: Winning Ways: NP-hardness question Mitch Harris (01/12/05)
- Re: The hyper-infinity believers friendly question george (01/12/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Ron Sperber (01/12/05)
- Re: Why NP Problem is Important and Practical Examples Rick Decker (01/12/05)
- Re: The hyper-infinity believers friendly question Will Twentyman (01/12/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? LordBeotian (01/12/05)
- Re: Why NP Problem is Important and Practical Examples Rick Decker (01/12/05)
- Re: HOW MANY DIGITS OF PI HAVE PROPERTY X ? Will Twentyman (01/12/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Daryl McCullough (01/12/05)
- Re: Fast arrays Paul E. Black (01/12/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Torkel Franzen (01/12/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Dave Seaman (01/12/05)
- Re: Why NP Problem is Important and Practical Examples Paul E. Black (01/12/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Daryl McCullough (01/12/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Torkel Franzen (01/12/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? LordBeotian (01/12/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? LordBeotian (01/12/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Daryl McCullough (01/12/05)
- Re: Why NP Problem is Important and Practical Examples Nicholas King (01/12/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? LordBeotian (01/12/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Lee Rudolph (01/12/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Torkel Franzen (01/12/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Torkel Franzen (01/12/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Ron Sperber (01/12/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? LordBeotian (01/12/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Torkel Franzen (01/12/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Torkel Franzen (01/12/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Ron Sperber (01/12/05)
- Re: Fast arrays Rick Decker (01/12/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? tchow_at_lsa.umich.edu (01/12/05)
- Re: Winning Ways: NP-hardness question tchow_at_lsa.umich.edu (01/12/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Torkel Franzen (01/12/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? tchow_at_lsa.umich.edu (01/12/05)
- Re: Fast arrays examachine_at_gmail.com (01/12/05)
- Re: Why NP Problem is Important and Practical Examples Rick Decker (01/12/05)
- Re: HOW MANY DIGITS OF PI HAVE PROPERTY X ? The Ghost In The Machine (01/12/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Daryl McCullough (01/12/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Torkel Franzen (01/12/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Daryl McCullough (01/12/05)
- Re: Fast arrays rehhman (01/12/05)
- Number System rehhman (01/12/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Ralph Hartley (01/12/05)
- Fast arrays Przemyslaw Wesolek (01/12/05)
- Re: The hyper-infinity believers friendly question Termite of Tempation (01/12/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Ralph Hartley (01/12/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Ralph Hartley (01/12/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Torkel Franzen (01/12/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? LordBeotian (01/12/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Torkel Franzen (01/12/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Daryl McCullough (01/12/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Torkel Franzen (01/12/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? LordBeotian (01/12/05)
- The hyper-infinity believers friendly question |-|erc (01/12/05)
- Re: Winning Ways: NP-hardness question Mitch Harris (01/12/05)
- Re: Finding maximal repeating substring using suffix tree Popai (01/12/05)
- Re: Winning Ways: NP-hardness question Mitch Harris (01/12/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Torkel Franzen (01/12/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Torkel Franzen (01/12/05)
- Re: Finding maximal repeating substring using suffix tree Alf P. Steinbach (01/12/05)
- Finding maximal repeating substring using suffix tree dayzman_at_hotmail.com (01/12/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? |-|erc (01/12/05)
- Re: Why NP Problem is Important and Practical Examples Nicholas King (01/12/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? namducnguyen (01/12/05)
- Re: HOW MANY DIGITS OF PI HAVE PROPERTY X ? |-|erc (01/12/05)
- A Clause Based Upperbound for 3XSAT Russell Easterly (01/12/05)
- Why NP Problem is Important and Practical Examples jrefactors_at_hotmail.com (01/12/05)
- Re: Easy question: WHICH LIST CONTAINS MORE DIGITS OF Pi? Ed Murphy (01/12/05)
- Re: Difference between AN UNKNOWN and UNKNOWN |-|erc (01/12/05)
- Re: Difference between AN UNKNOWN and UNKNOWN |-|erc (01/12/05)
- Re: Difference between AN UNKNOWN and UNKNOWN Will Twentyman (01/12/05)
- Re: Difference between AN UNKNOWN and UNKNOWN |-|erc (01/12/05)
- Re: Difference between AN UNKNOWN and UNKNOWN The Ghost In The Machine (01/12/05)
- SIGACT News Deadline, Feb 1 David J. Haglin (01/12/05)
- Re: Difference between AN UNKNOWN and UNKNOWN Will Twentyman (01/12/05)
- Re: Easy question: WHICH LIST CONTAINS MORE DIGITS OF Pi? george (01/12/05)
- Re: Difference between AN UNKNOWN and UNKNOWN |-|erc (01/12/05)
- Re: Easy question: WHICH LIST CONTAINS MORE DIGITS OF Pi? |-|erc (01/12/05)
- Re: Difference between AN UNKNOWN and UNKNOWN Will Twentyman (01/12/05)
- Re: Easy question: WHICH LIST CONTAINS MORE DIGITS OF Pi? george (01/12/05)
- Re: Easy question: WHICH LIST CONTAINS MORE DIGITS OF Pi? george (01/12/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Jeffrey Ketland (01/12/05)
- Re: Difference between AN UNKNOWN and UNKNOWN |-|erc (01/12/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? |-|erc (01/12/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Josh Purinton (01/12/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? poopdeville_at_gmail.com (01/12/05)
- Re: In case you studied the GOTO theoretical language... ken quirici (01/12/05)
- Re: In case you studied the GOTO theoretical language... r.e.s. (01/12/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? tchow_at_lsa.umich.edu (01/12/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? tchow_at_lsa.umich.edu (01/12/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Ralph Hartley (01/11/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Ralph Hartley (01/11/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Ralph Hartley (01/11/05)
- Re: HOW MANY DIGITS OF PI HAVE PROPERTY X ? Will Twentyman (01/11/05)
- Re: Difference between AN UNKNOWN and UNKNOWN Will Twentyman (01/11/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? tchow_at_lsa.umich.edu (01/11/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? tchow_at_lsa.umich.edu (01/11/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Daryl McCullough (01/11/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Daryl McCullough (01/11/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Torkel Franzen (01/11/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Ralph Hartley (01/11/05)
- Re: In case you studied the GOTO theoretical language... ken quirici (01/11/05)
- Re: Winning Ways: NP-hardness question Mike Robson (01/11/05)
- Re: Winning Ways: NP-hardness question Mike Robson (01/11/05)
- Re: Winning Ways: NP-hardness question tchow_at_lsa.umich.edu (01/11/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Torkel Franzen (01/11/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? tchow_at_lsa.umich.edu (01/11/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Ralph Hartley (01/11/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? tchow_at_lsa.umich.edu (01/11/05)
- Re: Winning Ways: NP-hardness question stephen_at_nomail.com (01/11/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Torkel Franzen (01/11/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Ralph Hartley (01/11/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Daryl McCullough (01/11/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Torkel Franzen (01/11/05)
- Re: Winning Ways: NP-hardness question tchow_at_lsa.umich.edu (01/11/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? tchow_at_lsa.umich.edu (01/11/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? tchow_at_lsa.umich.edu (01/11/05)
- Re: Winning Ways: NP-hardness question Mike Robson (01/11/05)
- Re: In case you studied the GOTO theoretical language... Rick Decker (01/11/05)
- Winning Ways: NP-hardness question Mitch Harris (01/11/05)
- Re: In case you studied the GOTO theoretical language... |-|erc (01/11/05)
- Re: In case you studied the GOTO theoretical language... H. J. Sander Bruggink (01/11/05)
- Re: Uncountability of reals was Re: countability of reals |-|erc (01/11/05)
- HOW MANY DIGITS OF PI HAVE PROPERTY X ? |-|erc (01/11/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Torkel Franzen (01/11/05)
- Re: Easy question: WHICH LIST CONTAINS MORE DIGITS OF Pi? |-|erc (01/11/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? |-|erc (01/11/05)
- Re: Easy question: WHICH LIST CONTAINS MORE DIGITS OF Pi? Ed Murphy (01/11/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? namducnguyen (01/11/05)
- Re: Difference between AN UNKNOWN and UNKNOWN |-|erc (01/11/05)
- Re: Difference between AN UNKNOWN and UNKNOWN The Ghost In The Machine (01/11/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? |-|erc (01/11/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? namducnguyen (01/11/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Torkel Franzen (01/11/05)
- Re: In case you studied the GOTO theoretical language... Kenneth Doyle (01/11/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? |-|erc (01/11/05)
- Re: Difference between AN UNKNOWN and UNKNOWN |-|erc (01/11/05)
- Re: In case you studied the GOTO theoretical language... David Moews (01/11/05)
- Re: Smaller UTM than Rule110 Mcintosh Harold V. (01/11/05)
- In case you studied the GOTO theoretical language... THE SWARM MASTER (01/11/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Ralph Hartley (01/10/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? tchow_at_lsa.umich.edu (01/10/05)
- Re: Smaller UTM than Rule110 tchow_at_lsa.umich.edu (01/10/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Daryl McCullough (01/10/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Ajoy K Thamattoor (01/10/05)
- Re: Difference between AN UNKNOWN and UNKNOWN Will Twentyman (01/10/05)
- Re: Smaller UTM than Rule110 Tim Tyler (01/10/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Torkel Franzen (01/10/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Ajoy K Thamattoor (01/10/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Daryl McCullough (01/10/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Torkel Franzen (01/10/05)
- Re: Smaller UTM than Rule110 Ralph Hartley (01/10/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? |-|erc (01/10/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Ralph Hartley (01/10/05)
- Re: Tree Automata Intersection Algorithm XMLGuy (01/10/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Torkel Franzen (01/10/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? |-|erc (01/10/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? tchow_at_lsa.umich.edu (01/10/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? tchow_at_lsa.umich.edu (01/10/05)
- Re: Easy question: WHICH LIST CONTAINS MORE DIGITS OF Pi? |-|erc (01/10/05)
- Re: Easy question: WHICH LIST CONTAINS MORE DIGITS OF Pi? Phil Carmody (01/10/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? |-|erc (01/10/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? namducnguyen (01/10/05)
- Re: In case you studied the GOTO theoretical language... |-|erc (01/10/05)
- Re: In case you studied the GOTO theoretical language... |-|erc (01/10/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Ajoy K Thamattoor (01/10/05)
- Re: Is this Binary Tree correct ? Rick Decker (01/10/05)
- Is this Binary Tree correct ? brianm (01/10/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? |-|erc (01/10/05)
- Re: OPPOSITE OF all coin sequences are computable to infinite length ? |-|erc (01/10/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Barb Knox (01/10/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Daniel W. Johnson (01/09/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Lee Rudolph (01/09/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Torkel Franzen (01/09/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Barb Knox (01/09/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Torkel Franzen (01/09/05)
- Re: Smaller UTM than Rule110 Mcintosh Harold V. (01/09/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Barb Knox (01/09/05)
- Re: OPPOSITE OF all coin sequences are computable to infinite length ? John Savard (01/09/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? John Savard (01/09/05)
- Re: Easy question: WHICH LIST CONTAINS MORE DIGITS OF Pi? John Savard (01/09/05)
- Re: Easy question: WHICH LIST CONTAINS MORE DIGITS OF Pi? John Savard (01/09/05)
- Re: Easy question: WHICH LIST CONTAINS MORE DIGITS OF Pi? Phil Carmody (01/09/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Ajoy K Thamattoor (01/09/05)
- In case you studied the GOTO theoretical language... THE SWARM MASTER (01/09/05)
- Re: Smaller UTM than Rule110 André Betz (01/09/05)
- Re: Easy question: WHICH LIST CONTAINS MORE DIGITS OF Pi? |-|erc (01/09/05)
- Re: Easy question: WHICH LIST CONTAINS MORE DIGITS OF Pi? George Cox (01/09/05)
- Re: Easy question: WHICH LIST CONTAINS MORE DIGITS OF Pi? George Cox (01/09/05)
- Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? Aatu Koskensilta (01/09/05)
- Re: Scholarship in Paderborn, Germany siahpoushha (01/09/05)
- Re: [complexity][algorithm] Find a clique in a graph Mladen Adamovic (01/09/05)
- Re: word relavence jblanch (01/09/05)
- THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false? |-|erc (01/09/05)
- Re: Easy question: WHICH LIST CONTAINS MORE DIGITS OF Pi? |-|erc (01/09/05)
- Re: Easy question: WHICH LIST CONTAINS MORE DIGITS OF Pi? |-|erc (01/09/05)
- Re: Easy question: WHICH LIST CONTAINS MORE DIGITS OF Pi? Barb Knox (01/08/05)
- Re: Easy question: WHICH LIST CONTAINS MORE DIGITS OF Pi? Arthur J. O'Dwyer (01/08/05)
- Re: [complexity][algorithm] Find a clique in a graph Kent Paul Dolan (01/08/05)
- [complexity][algorithm] Find a clique in a graph Marco (01/08/05)
- Re: Easy question: WHICH LIST CONTAINS MORE DIGITS OF Pi? George Cox (01/08/05)
- Re: Kolmogorov? Christoph M. Wintersteiger (01/08/05)
- Easy question: WHICH LIST CONTAINS MORE DIGITS OF Pi? |-|erc (01/08/05)
- Re: OPPOSITE OF all coin sequences are computable to infinite length ? |-|erc (01/08/05)
- Re: OPPOSITE OF all coin sequences are computable to infinite length ? Tim Peters (01/08/05)
- CFP: CP-AI-OR 2005: Last call for papers W.J. van Hoeve (01/08/05)
- Re: OPPOSITE OF all coin sequences are computable to infinite length ? |-|erc (01/08/05)
- Difference between AN UNKNOWN and UNKNOWN |-|erc (01/08/05)
- Kolmogorov? Rick Decker (01/08/05)
- Re: Tree Automata Intersection Algorithm Matt Timmermans (01/08/05)
- Re: OPPOSITE OF all coin sequences are computable to infinite length ? |-|erc (01/08/05)
- Re: Towards disproof of Omega Timothy Little (01/08/05)
- Re: OPPOSITE OF all coin sequences are computable to infinite length ? Timothy Little (01/07/05)
- Re: OPPOSITE OF all coin sequences are computable to infinite length ? Timothy Little (01/07/05)
- Test, Please ignore! John (01/07/05)
- Re: Towards disproof of Omega The Ghost In The Machine (01/07/05)
- Tree Automata Intersection Algorithm google_at_technologist.com (01/07/05)
- Re: MTTF of a Disk Array berndlosert_at_netscape.net (01/07/05)
- Re: Towards disproof of Omega Kent Paul Dolan (01/07/05)
- Re: Finding large bipartite subgraphs tchow_at_lsa.umich.edu (01/07/05)
- Re: OPPOSITE OF all coin sequences are computable to infinite length ? Richard Tobin (01/07/05)
- Re: OPPOSITE OF all coin sequences are computable to infinite length ? briggs_at_encompasserve.org (01/07/05)
- Finding large bipartite subgraphs Jussi Rintanen (01/07/05)
- Re: Towards disproof of Omega |-|erc (01/07/05)
- Re: OPPOSITE OF all coin sequences are computable to infinite length ? |-|erc (01/07/05)
- Re: OPPOSITE OF all coin sequences are computable to infinite length ? Timothy Little (01/07/05)
- Re: word relavence Casey Hawthorne (01/07/05)
- Re: OPPOSITE OF all coin sequences are computable to infinite length ? |-|erc (01/07/05)
- word relavence jblanch (01/07/05)
- Re: OPPOSITE OF all coin sequences are computable to infinite length ? Tim Peters (01/07/05)
- turing machine Kvele (01/07/05)
- Re: Towards disproof of Omega The Ghost In The Machine (01/07/05)
- Re: OPPOSITE OF all coin sequences are computable to infinite length ? The Ghost In The Machine (01/07/05)
- Re: OPPOSITE OF all coin sequences are computable to infinite length ? |-|erc (01/07/05)
- Re: OPPOSITE OF all coin sequences are computable to infinite length ? Will Twentyman (01/07/05)
- Re: OPPOSITE OF all coin sequences are computable to infinite length ? Robert Kolker (01/07/05)
- Re: OPPOSITE OF all coin sequences are computable to infinite length ? |-|erc (01/07/05)
- Re: OPPOSITE OF all coin sequences are computable to infinite length ? Daryl McCullough (01/07/05)
- OPPOSITE OF all coin sequences are computable to infinite length ? |-|erc (01/07/05)
- Re: Smaller UTM than Rule110 Tim Tyler (01/06/05)
- Re: Smaller UTM than Rule110 Kent Paul Dolan (01/06/05)
- Towards disproof of Omega 2 |-|erc (01/06/05)
- Towards disproof of Omega |-|erc (01/06/05)
- Re: Smaller UTM than Rule110 Ralph Hartley (01/05/05)
- Re: Smaller UTM than Rule110 Mitch Harris (01/05/05)
- Re: Smaller UTM than Rule110 Tim Tyler (01/05/05)
- Re: Smaller UTM than Rule110 tchow_at_lsa.umich.edu (01/05/05)
- Re: Smaller UTM than Rule110 Rick Decker (01/05/05)
- Re: Smaller UTM than Rule110 Tim Tyler (01/05/05)
- Re: Smaller UTM than Rule110 Kenneth Doyle (01/04/05)
- Re: Smaller UTM than Rule110 Rick Decker (01/04/05)
- Re: Smaller UTM than Rule110 Tim Tyler (01/04/05)
- Re: Smaller UTM than Rule110 Tim Tyler (01/04/05)
- Re: Smaller UTM than Rule110 tchow_at_lsa.umich.edu (01/04/05)
- Re: Smaller UTM than Rule110 Rick Decker (01/04/05)
- Re: Smaller UTM than Rule110 Torkel Franzen (01/04/05)
- Re: Smaller UTM than Rule110 Tim Tyler (01/04/05)
- Re: MTTF of a Disk Array berndlosert_at_netscape.net (01/04/05)
- Re: Smaller UTM than Rule110 Tim Tyler (01/04/05)
- Re: Smaller UTM than Rule110 Kent Paul Dolan (01/04/05)
- Re: Smaller UTM than Rule110 Kent Paul Dolan (01/04/05)
- SafeDisc and others... Dan Rossul (01/04/05)
- Re: Smaller UTM than Rule110 Tim Tyler (01/04/05)
- Re: Smaller UTM than Rule110 Tim Tyler (01/04/05)
- Re: Smaller UTM than Rule110 Kent Paul Dolan (01/04/05)
- Re: Smaller UTM than Rule110 Kent Paul Dolan (01/03/05)
- Re: Smaller UTM than Rule110 Russell Easterly (01/03/05)
- Re: MTTF of a Disk Array stephen_at_nomail.com (01/03/05)
- Re: Smaller UTM than Rule110 Tim Tyler (01/03/05)
- Re: MTTF of a Disk Array berndlosert_at_netscape.net (01/03/05)
- Re: Smaller UTM than Rule110 r.e.s. (01/03/05)
- Re: Smaller UTM than Rule110 Ralph Hartley (01/03/05)
- Re: Silly Recurrence per.vognsen_at_gmail.com (01/03/05)
- Re: MTTF of a Disk Array Matt Timmermans (01/03/05)
- MTTF of a Disk Array berndlosert_at_netscape.net (01/03/05)
- Re: Smaller UTM than Rule110 Tim Tyler (01/03/05)
- Re: [meta]: Smaller UTM than Rule110 Tim Tyler (01/02/05)
- Re: Smaller UTM than Rule110 Tim Tyler (01/02/05)
- Re: Smaller UTM than Rule110 Tim Tyler (01/02/05)
- Re: Smaller UTM than Rule110 Kent Paul Dolan (01/02/05)
- [meta]: Smaller UTM than Rule110 Kent Paul Dolan (01/02/05)
- Re: Smaller UTM than Rule110 r.e.s. (01/02/05)
- Re: Smaller UTM than Rule110 r.e.s. (01/02/05)
- Re: Smaller UTM than Rule110 André Betz (01/02/05)
- Re: Smaller UTM than Rule110 Tim Tyler (01/02/05)
- Re: Smaller UTM than Rule110 Charlie-Boo (01/02/05)
- Re: Smaller UTM than Rule110 Markus Redeker (01/02/05)
- Re: Smaller UTM than Rule110 Kent Paul Dolan (01/02/05)
- examples of nfa to dfa conversion sergei_m_1_at_yahoo.com (01/01/05)
- Smaller UTM than Rule110 André Betz (01/01/05)
- Re: Shannon's information theory Thomas B. (01/01/05)
- [META] Google "Scholar" Kent Paul Dolan (12/31/04)
Last message date: 01/31/05
Archived on: 01/31/05 CET
1272 messages sorted by: [ author ] [ thread ] [ subject ]