Re: does sqrt(2) exist in CM?
From: Daniel W. Johnson (panoptes_at_iquest.net)
Date: 02/07/05
- Next message: tchow_at_lsa.umich.edu: "Re: Probability theory in (0,1) (Was Re: does sqrt(2) exist in CM?)"
- Previous message: examachine_at_gmail.com: "Re: does sqrt(2) exist in CM?"
- In reply to: Joe Kearney: "Re: does sqrt(2) exist in CM?"
- Next in thread: Joe Kearney: "Re: does sqrt(2) exist in CM?"
- Reply: Joe Kearney: "Re: does sqrt(2) exist in CM?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2005 16:31:40 -0500
Joe Kearney <joek350@gmail.com> wrote:
> a lecturer of mine (tim gowers) once made a comment (somewhat better
> phrased) that with only finitely many symbols available in mathematics
> for describing numbers, we can only represent countably many reals. do
> uncomputable numbers in some sense correspond to the un-representable
> ones? or does it mean rather that we can't simply compute the value,
> but that it does exist (whatever that means...)
The un-representable real numbers are a proper subset of the
uncomputable real numbers.
-- Daniel W. Johnson panoptes@iquest.net http://members.iquest.net/~panoptes/ 039 53 36 N / 086 11 55 W
- Next message: tchow_at_lsa.umich.edu: "Re: Probability theory in (0,1) (Was Re: does sqrt(2) exist in CM?)"
- Previous message: examachine_at_gmail.com: "Re: does sqrt(2) exist in CM?"
- In reply to: Joe Kearney: "Re: does sqrt(2) exist in CM?"
- Next in thread: Joe Kearney: "Re: does sqrt(2) exist in CM?"
- Reply: Joe Kearney: "Re: does sqrt(2) exist in CM?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|