Re: definition: co-moron
From: willisA40 (invalid_at_nospam.com)
Date: 02/09/05
- Next message: examachine_at_gmail.com: "Re: Existence of mathematical entities (Re: Successor Axiom: on what grounds TF?)"
- Previous message: John Hasenkam: "Re: Existence of mathematical entities (Re: Successor Axiom: on what grounds TF?)"
- In reply to: mcyberliver: "Re: definition: co-moron"
- Next in thread: mcyberliver: "Re: definition: co-moron"
- Reply: mcyberliver: "Re: definition: co-moron"
- Reply: Acme Diagnostics: "Re: definition: co-moron"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2005 22:25:40 -0600
"mcyberliver" <michael.calder@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1107909133.985534.189830@l41g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
> Then what is a contra-moron....a moron contra-dependent.....that is, a
> moron independent
> like your self.
>
Agree with excellent definition of co-moron.
Where would co-moron and troll fit in?
not all trolls are morons, not all morons are trolls
However morons responding to trolls are already morons, so the troll becomes
the co-moron
trolls responding to morons (it is what they do) but that also makes the
troll a co-moron
Therefore all trolls become co-morons naturally. Therefore, the superset
{co-moron} included all trolls and all morons, except for singularities
(single troll, single moron)
- Next message: examachine_at_gmail.com: "Re: Existence of mathematical entities (Re: Successor Axiom: on what grounds TF?)"
- Previous message: John Hasenkam: "Re: Existence of mathematical entities (Re: Successor Axiom: on what grounds TF?)"
- In reply to: mcyberliver: "Re: definition: co-moron"
- Next in thread: mcyberliver: "Re: definition: co-moron"
- Reply: mcyberliver: "Re: definition: co-moron"
- Reply: Acme Diagnostics: "Re: definition: co-moron"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
