Re: MTTF of a Disk Array
From: Pest (pest_at_nuisancenospam.org)
Date: 02/23/05
- Previous message: R-matrix: "Re: Existence of mathematical entities (Re: Successor Axiom: on what grounds TF?)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 06:45:12 +0000 (UTC)
stephen@nomail.com wrote:
> berndlosert@netscape.net wrote:
> :> The formula from "A case for RAID" is based on the assumption that
> : each
> :> single disk has a constant probability of failure during each day
> : that it is
> :> in use. Estimating MTTF using this formula is conservative, in that
> : the
> :> result you calculate will be shorter than the real MTTF, because
> : disks
> :> generally fail less often when they are new.
> : You say the formula is conservative but what is this based on exactly?
> : Is there any experimental evidence?
> It is based on probability theory. Consider a coin tossing
> experiment with a coin that comes up tails with probability p.
> The expected number of tosses before a tail appears is 1/p.
> If you think of a tail as a failure, then the MTTF is 1/p.
Right. And what is the probability _distribution_?
> If you toss n coins, the probability of seeing a tails is
> 1-(1-p)^n which for small p is approximately np. The expected number
> of tosses before a tail appears is now approximately 1/np.
> Stephen
- Previous message: R-matrix: "Re: Existence of mathematical entities (Re: Successor Axiom: on what grounds TF?)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|