learning k-term DNF and k-CNF
From: Sicco Verwer (sicco_at_ik)
Date: 02/25/05
- Previous message: nobody: "Re: hard puzzle"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 14:08:17 +0100
Hi,
I need help understanding a principle in computational learning theory.
Basically what I do not understand is this:
learning 3-term DNF is NP-complete
learning 3-CNF is efficiently PAC learnable (is RP)
I can solve 3-term DNF by solving it in 3-CNF space, this is efficient
(RP). There is a polynomial transformation from 3-term DNF to an
equivalent 3-CNF formula.
How come this does not imply RP = NP? Am I missing some exponential
factor somewhere or is the 3-CNF solution not a real solution for the
3-term DNF problem? Why can't I solve for example 3 graph coloring,
which is reducible to learning 3-term DNF formulas, by learning CNF
formulas?
thanks,
Sicco Verwer
- Previous message: nobody: "Re: hard puzzle"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]