Re: Existence of mathematical entities (Re: Successor Axiom: on what grounds TF?)

From: Mike Oliver (mike_lists_at_verizon.net)
Date: 02/28/05 

Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 09:09:27 -0600

Mitch Harris wrote:
> examachine@gmail.com wrote:
>> Nothing exists until you have empirical evidence for it.
>
> Or rewritten to make your context more apparent:
>
> "You don't know anything exists until you have empirical evidence for it"

That's not really in context. Eray didn't just deny knowledge
of Cerberus' existence. He asserted flatly that Cerberus does *not*
("physically") exist. That's quite a different matter.

Relevant Pages
Loading