Re: are Real Numbers evil? The answer(?).
- From: "Claudio Grondi" <claudio.grondi@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 00:26:12 -0000
> I would have tried sci.math. comp.theory is for people who worry about
> things like program correctness, etc.
>From my up to now experience I suppose,
that there is no appropriate newgroup for
what I am asking for. My first thought was,
that comp.theory might be the best one
to get attention from people who might
eventually know what I am trying to get
from the "symptoms" of how I ask for it.
It seems, that this assumption was wrong.
Claudio
"Brandon J. Van Every" <mylastnameruntogether@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> schrieb im
Newsbeitrag news:Sgqne.14048$w21.10394@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Claudio Grondi wrote:
>
> >Currently it appears to me, that it is not
> >possible to talk here about 3D without
> >using for it a real number based coordinate
> >system approach, so I posted to the wrong
> >newsgroup asking what I have asked for.
> >
> >
> I would have tried sci.math. comp.theory is for people who worry about
> things like program correctness, etc.
>
> --
> Cheers, www.indiegamedesign.com
> Brandon Van Every Seattle, WA
>
> "The pioneer is the one with the arrows in his back."
> - anonymous entrepreneur
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: are Real Numbers evil? The answer(?).
- From: Navin Kumar
- Re: are Real Numbers evil? The answer(?).
- References:
- Re: are Real Numbers evil? The answer(?).
- From: Brandon J. Van Every
- Re: are Real Numbers evil? The answer(?).
- Prev by Date: Re: ZFC
- Next by Date: Re: are Real Numbers evil?
- Previous by thread: Re: are Real Numbers evil? The answer(?).
- Next by thread: Re: are Real Numbers evil? The answer(?).
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|