Re: ZFC



haberg@xxxxxxxxxx (Hans Aberg) writes:

> This was discussed earlier in the posts. ZFC is perfectly legit for most
> working math in the absense of anything better, but not all; it is not the
> one and only model, nor does it solve the foundational issues of math in a
> formal manner.

ZFC isn't a model at all, but a theory. As for "solving the
foundational issues of mathematics in a formal manner", this has
no obvious meaning. What do you require of such a solution?

.