Re: modified-- strongly connected components(SCC)?
- From: Luis Quesada <luque@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2005 23:52:57 +0200
Amit Gupta wrote:
I am surely missing the point, but I don't see the problem with filtering out the components that violates the constraint after the list of SCCs has been generated. As far as I understand, filtering out the non-valid components does not increase the complexity of the algorithm. Are you aiming at doing better than O(V+E)?I think, I should've been clear on this one (thanks for bringing it up)
1. If a single SCC contain 2M vertices of specific type, nothing is reported for that component.
The other way to look at the desired output is: The result should be similar to, if I instead do the following steps: 1. Run SCC without caring about any virtex-type. 2. From all the components I get from Step-1, prune those components, which have vertices of type "that" more than M times.
Luis .
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: modified-- strongly connected components(SCC)?
- From: Amit Gupta
- Re: modified-- strongly connected components(SCC)?
- References:
- modified-- strongly connected components(SCC)?
- From: Amit Gupta
- Re: modified-- strongly connected components(SCC)?
- From: Patricia Shanahan
- Re: modified-- strongly connected components(SCC)?
- From: Amit Gupta
- modified-- strongly connected components(SCC)?
- Prev by Date: Re: modified-- strongly connected components(SCC)?
- Next by Date: www.beyond-science.net
- Previous by thread: Re: modified-- strongly connected components(SCC)?
- Next by thread: Re: modified-- strongly connected components(SCC)?
- Index(es):