Re: Complexity of a specific kind of instances of a NP-complete problem
- From: "Thomas A. Li" <tli@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 21:53:23 -0400
Here the main point is the size of the cluster.
If the cluster is of finite size, and everyone is in P, then a universal
algorithm exists by calling them one by one until an answer is obtained.
If the cluster is of infinite size, how to store and use them?
Thomas Li
"feeldead" <feeldead@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1127391886.721145.90080@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> I have almost the same wondering. NPC makes sense only regarding a
> class of instances belonging to a certain problem and we can't say that
> an instance is NPC according current complexity theory. My question is
> for a certain instance, for example TSP with 10000 nodes, how many
> years are needed to resolve it, using computer, mathematics, whatever?
> If we can resolve it in a resonabe time limit, supposing 1000 years,
> which is far more less than the time needed for a computer program to
> resolve the general TSP problem, why can't we find solution for another
> TSP instance? If we don't expect to resolve all the instances of TSP
> with a single program, but search for a cluster of algorithms for
> resolve all the instances, with every algorithm aiming to one or
> several instances. Can we resolve the NPC problem in this sense?
>
.
- References:
- Complexity of a specific kind of instances of a NP-complete problem
- From: snowballbhb
- Re: Complexity of a specific kind of instances of a NP-complete problem
- From: Craig Feinstein
- Re: Complexity of a specific kind of instances of a NP-complete problem
- From: feeldead
- Complexity of a specific kind of instances of a NP-complete problem
- Prev by Date: Re: Dijkstra's Paper
- Next by Date: ILP formulations
- Previous by thread: Re: Complexity of a specific kind of instances of a NP-complete problem
- Next by thread: Re: Complexity of a specific kind of instances of a NP-complete problem
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|