Re: minimum disjoint paths covering of a graph - algorithm needed
- From: "Marcin" <arcgrz@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2005 10:34:18 +0100
>> John Gabbriel:
> Ah, well that makes the problem hard.
> I think it is NP-Complete as Hamiltonian path problem can be reduced to
> this.
[...]
yes, u are right. i have spent some hours googling, and i have found that
for bipartite graphs it's NP-complete ...
there are only some special graph types where its polynomial-time or less.
for example : directed acyclic graphs, cographs, trees.
i also tried to find how to compute the number of minimum path cover (not
the solution, just the number of paths i need), but with no resoults :/
AFAIK it's not NP-complete,
thank you.
Marcin
zgadnij@xxxxxxxxx
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: minimum disjoint paths covering of a graph - algorithm needed
- From: John Gabbriel
- Re: minimum disjoint paths covering of a graph - algorithm needed
- References:
- Re: minimum disjoint paths covering of a graph - algorithm needed
- From: Marcin
- Re: minimum disjoint paths covering of a graph - algorithm needed
- From: John Gabbriel
- Re: minimum disjoint paths covering of a graph - algorithm needed
- Prev by Date: Re: minimum disjoint paths covering of a graph - algorithm needed
- Next by Date: Re: minimum disjoint paths covering of a graph - algorithm needed
- Previous by thread: Re: minimum disjoint paths covering of a graph - algorithm needed
- Next by thread: Re: minimum disjoint paths covering of a graph - algorithm needed
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading