Another clueless wikipedia article

From: examachine@xxxxxxxxx
Date: 22 Jan 2006 07:19:55 -0800

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computability_theory_%28computer_science%29

This article assumes that desktop computers cannot be turing machines.
Here we go again. Why is there no shortage of these fools who fail to
understand the simple explanations in the cinderella book?

.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Another clueless wikipedia article
  - From: Simon G Best
- Re: Another clueless wikipedia article
  - From: examachine

Prev by Date: Significance of "Relativizations of the P =? NP Question"
Next by Date: Re: Another clueless wikipedia article
Previous by thread: Significance of "Relativizations of the P =? NP Question"
Next by thread: Re: Another clueless wikipedia article
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Relevant Pages

Re: Can a regular Turing Machine provide Protected Memory?
... > to a CRT ... Turing machines do not have protected memory, ... If this strongest case succumbs to refutation, ...
(sci.logic)
Re: Can a regular Turing Machine provide Protected Memory?
... > to a CRT ... Turing machines do not have protected memory, ... If this strongest case succumbs to refutation, ...
(comp.theory)
Re: (Prolog + LISP + Erlang) with integration issues versus C++
... > So, yes, capitalists are fools, and your project is probably going to ... > fail. ... And guess were the blame for that failure's going to land? ...
(comp.lang.lisp)
Re: Acting with James Franco Chapter III
... You fail, Ape. ... "And how can we win when fools can be kings?" ...
(rec.sport.pro-wrestling)