Re: Another clueless wikipedia article
- From: examachine@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: 22 Jan 2006 16:33:25 -0800
Simon G Best wrote:
> > It may be sufficient just to change that
> > first sentence so it gets the reference right, and perhaps remove the
> > bit about "all real computers", I really think that bit is problematic.
> > Because it does imply that all real computers are FSMs and not TMs. [...]
>
> No. That may be what you're (incorrectly) inferring from it, but it's
> not what it's saying or implying.
>
> :-(
Hmm, Ben seemed to draw the same thing as I did, and he even agreed to
that case (saying that physical computers cannot implement countable
infinity). That's why I now think it is misleading. It is an ambiguous
expression there.
Anyway, I agree with your view that a real computer can be
both an FSM and a TM, but I don't think that a reader will
easily notice that unless he already knows it. Most likely, he
will think that TMs are not about desktop computers!
Regards,
--
Eray
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Another clueless wikipedia article
- From: Simon G Best
- Re: Another clueless wikipedia article
- References:
- Another clueless wikipedia article
- From: examachine
- Re: Another clueless wikipedia article
- From: Simon G Best
- Re: Another clueless wikipedia article
- From: examachine
- Re: Another clueless wikipedia article
- From: Simon G Best
- Another clueless wikipedia article
- Prev by Date: Re: Another clueless wikipedia article
- Next by Date: Re: Another clueless wikipedia article
- Previous by thread: Re: Another clueless wikipedia article
- Next by thread: Re: Another clueless wikipedia article
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|