Re: Ambuguity of CFG
- From: "beelzebub" <tarball@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 13 Feb 2006 13:13:44 -0800
S -> a S a and S -> a
The above is not an ambiguous grammar.
The following is an ambiguous grammar.
S -> S + S | S - S | a
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Ambuguity of CFG
- From: Torben Ægidius Mogensen
- Re: Ambuguity of CFG
- From: J.Jongejan
- Re: Ambuguity of CFG
- From: stylez
- Re: Ambuguity of CFG
- References:
- Ambuguity of CFG
- From: stylez
- Re: Ambuguity of CFG
- From: J.Jongejan
- Ambuguity of CFG
- Prev by Date: Re: languages
- Next by Date: Re: languages
- Previous by thread: Re: Ambuguity of CFG
- Next by thread: Re: Ambuguity of CFG
- Index(es):