# Re: Complexity Theory for Simpletons

*From*: "Googmeister" <googmeister@xxxxxxxxx>*Date*: 27 Mar 2006 04:14:23 -0800

Craig Feinstein wrote:

Tim, I appreciate that you have read my paper and have given your

feedback. I don't agree with your criticisms, but I don't really have

the time to argue with you either, so let's just agree to disagree.

Tim's has exposed a serious flaw in your argument. Since the

flaw is so fundamental, if you don't have time to reconcile it,

I think you should retract your paper before others spend their

time reading it.

Thanks again to Tim for his willingness to carefully read your

work and clearly articulate its faulty reasoning (when it's hard

for those more cynical to not wonder whether this is just a

trolling expedition.)

.

**Follow-Ups**:**Re: Complexity Theory for Simpletons***From:*Woeginger Gerhard

**Re: Complexity Theory for Simpletons***From:*Craig Feinstein

**References**:**Complexity Theory for Simpletons***From:*Craig Feinstein

**Re: Complexity Theory for Simpletons***From:*tchow

**Re: Complexity Theory for Simpletons***From:*tchow

**Re: Complexity Theory for Simpletons***From:*Craig Feinstein

**Re: Complexity Theory for Simpletons***From:*tchow

**Re: Complexity Theory for Simpletons***From:*Craig Feinstein

- Prev by Date:
**Re: Complexity Theory for Simpletons** - Next by Date:
**Re: One stack, two queues** - Previous by thread:
**Re: Complexity Theory for Simpletons** - Next by thread:
**Re: Complexity Theory for Simpletons** - Index(es):