Re: solving #SAT in poly(number of vars) and exp(number of clauses)?
- From: sasha mal <sashaDELETEITmal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 22:04:10 +0200
iatsonios@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
I am not sure,but as far as i know the problem of Sat is np-complete,so
it needs exponential amount(2^n)of time to solve it,#sat,is just to
enumerate the solutions of SAT that make it satisfiable,then the #sat
is much harder than SAT,so i believe that only a brute force(&naive
approach )can be utilized for your problem.In case you need something
email me and i will send you any paper that i might have.
Cheers Yannis.
You said me nothing new, but thanks nevertheless ;-).
Cheers,
Sasha.
.
- References:
- solving #SAT in poly(number of vars) and exp(number of clauses)?
- From: sasha mal
- Re: solving #SAT in poly(number of vars) and exp(number of clauses)?
- From: iatsonios
- solving #SAT in poly(number of vars) and exp(number of clauses)?
- Prev by Date: Why LL(1) Parsers do not support left recursion?
- Next by Date: Re: Why LL(1) Parsers do not support left recursion?
- Previous by thread: Re: solving #SAT in poly(number of vars) and exp(number of clauses)?
- Next by thread: lists/unions/intersections:
- Index(es):