Re: basic query regarding NP Complete...
- From: "Russell Easterly" <logiclab@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 02:38:42 -0700
"Prakash" <helloprak@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1156569181.083044.321040@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
any instance of a known NP-Complete problem, like 3-SAT,
can be converted, in polynomial time, into an instance of "a",
an instance of "b", and an instance of "c". Then you can say X
is a set of NP-Complete problems.
I have a question here. Forgive me if I sound a little stupid.. I
wanted to know if NP-Complete consists 'ONLY' of SAT and other problem
related to it by 'polynomially reducable' relation. I suppose cookes
first proved that SAT was NP Hard and in NP and hence NP completed
?(correct me if I am wrong). And the tree started from there. Is it
also possile to have an entirely different set of problem, unrelated to
SAT ( or atleast not depending on SAT and its relatives ) to be NP
complete. Say start by proving a problem is NP and NP hard... and then
polynomially reduce it to other problems.
Question in short... Why does it always have to start with SAT ?
The definition of NP-Complete requires that you be able to show any problem
in NP can be converted in polynomial time into the problem you are claiming
is NP-Complete.
Using SAT is probably the simplest way to prove another problem is
NP-Complete.
And you have to show SAT can be converted to prove the other problem
is NP-Complete. SAT doesn't have to be the "first" one, but you have to
prove it anyway, so why not start with SAT.
Russell
- 2 many 2 count
.
- References:
- basic query regarding NP Complete...
- From: Prakash
- Re: basic query regarding NP Complete...
- From: Kai Schories
- Re: basic query regarding NP Complete...
- From: Prakash
- Re: basic query regarding NP Complete...
- From: Russell Easterly
- Re: basic query regarding NP Complete...
- From: Prakash
- basic query regarding NP Complete...
- Prev by Date: Re: basic query regarding NP Complete...
- Next by Date: Re: Shortest path with intermediate nodes algorithm
- Previous by thread: Re: basic query regarding NP Complete...
- Next by thread: Re: basic query regarding NP Complete...
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading