Re: An algorithm with Minimum vertex cover without considering its performance
- From: Patricia Shanahan <pats@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 20:05:13 GMT
wtxwtx@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
Hi,....
I know that searching for a minimum vertex cover is a NP-Complete in
computing complexity.
I am interested not in its performance, but in an algorithm that can
get a right solution in theory as a mind exercise.
If you really don't care about performance, why not go brute force?
Iterate over the subsets of V, testing each one for being a vertex
cover, and return the smallest subset that passes.
Patricia
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Prev by Date: An algorithm with Minimum vertex cover without considering its performance
- Next by Date: Re: An algorithm with Minimum vertex cover without considering its performance
- Previous by thread: An algorithm with Minimum vertex cover without considering its performance
- Next by thread: Re: An algorithm with Minimum vertex cover without considering its performance
- Index(es):