Re: An algorithm with Minimum vertex cover without considering its performance
- From: wtxwtx@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: 23 Sep 2006 18:18:15 -0700
Patricia Shanahan wrote:
wtxwtx@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
Hi,...
I know that searching for a minimum vertex cover is a NP-Complete in
computing complexity.
I am interested not in its performance, but in an algorithm that can
get a right solution in theory as a mind exercise.
If you really don't care about performance, why not go brute force?
Iterate over the subsets of V, testing each one for being a vertex
cover, and return the smallest subset that passes.
Patricia
Hi Patricia,
As a mind exercise, I prefer to developing a smart algorithm over using
brute force.
I think there are many smart points in this minimum vertex cover design
that have not been used fully.
It may be possible one day the algorithm would be reused as a base in a
polynomial time.
Weng
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- An algorithm with Minimum vertex cover without considering its performance
- From: wtxwtx
- Re: An algorithm with Minimum vertex cover without considering its performance
- From: Patricia Shanahan
- An algorithm with Minimum vertex cover without considering its performance
- Prev by Date: Re: An algorithm with Minimum vertex cover without considering its performance
- Next by Date: Re: (Probably flawed) Polynomial time Graph Isomorphism
- Previous by thread: Re: An algorithm with Minimum vertex cover without considering its performance
- Next by thread: Re: An algorithm with Minimum vertex cover without considering its performance
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|