Re: An algorithm with Minimum vertex cover without considering its performance
- From: "Weng Tianxiang" <wtxwtx@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 24 Sep 2006 12:43:23 -0700
eKo1 wrote:
Weng Tianxiang wrote:
1. I don't know what the adjacency graph of G. Please tell it in more
details.
Oops. I meant to say adjanceny matrix. Surely you know what that is.
2. The following operations can be simplified by setting 1 to i's or
j's bit of a bit array L; If K's bit of the bit array L = 1, the vertex
K is selected.
Right. That is much simpler and easier.
3. Please let me know where the algorithm come from. If there is a
reference, please let me know.
I just thought it up when I read this post.
Hi eKo1,
Your algorithm to get minimum vertex cover is wrong.
See the following website and calculate the graph in the webiste and
you will know the algorithm you suggest is wrong.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adjacency_Matrix
Thank you.
Weng
.
- References:
- An algorithm with Minimum vertex cover without considering its performance
- From: wtxwtx
- Re: An algorithm with Minimum vertex cover without considering its performance
- From: Patricia Shanahan
- Re: An algorithm with Minimum vertex cover without considering its performance
- From: wtxwtx
- Re: An algorithm with Minimum vertex cover without considering its performance
- From: eKo1
- Re: An algorithm with Minimum vertex cover without considering its performance
- From: Weng Tianxiang
- Re: An algorithm with Minimum vertex cover without considering its performance
- From: eKo1
- An algorithm with Minimum vertex cover without considering its performance
- Prev by Date: On the complexity of determining whether n numbers are distinct
- Next by Date: Re: More beginner questions about SAT...
- Previous by thread: Re: An algorithm with Minimum vertex cover without considering its performance
- Next by thread: Re: An algorithm with Minimum vertex cover without considering its performance
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|