Re: Growth Rate of Level-k Goodstein Function
- From: "Deedlit" <roycepeng@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 19 Oct 2006 07:25:06 -0700
r.e.s. wrote:
The version using F_a seems to be another way of writing what I
posted 2006-09-21 (my x_i are your c_i, and my p is your m) ...
g_2(n) = f_p^x_p f_(p-1)^x_(p-1) ... f_0^x_0 a - a
that is,
B_2(n) = f_p^x_p f_(p-1)^x_(p-1) ... f_0^x_0 a
where many parentheses are omitted for easier reading, and where
f_0 (t) = t + 1
f_(k+1) (t) = f_k^(t+1) (t).
Hmm... I think for this to work, there has to be an increment on the
limit ordinals as well. I've seen the GW hierarchy with t+1 as the
exponent, but not in the fundamental sequence.
A question about terminology ...
I see the F_a hierarchy variously called the Wainer hierarchy,
the extended Grzegorczyk hierarchy, and the Grzegorczyk-Wainer
hierarchy; but, as I recall, the f_a (appropriately defined at
limit ordinals) were used by Wainer in his 1989 JSL paper
"Slow Growing versus Fast Growing". Are the f_a sometimes also
called "the Wainer hierarchy"?
I'd say they would also be called by any of the above names, just like
there are numerous variants of the Ackermann function.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Growth Rate of Level-k Goodstein Function
- From: r.e.s.
- Re: Growth Rate of Level-k Goodstein Function
- References:
- Re: Growth Rate of Level-k Goodstein Function
- From: Deedlit
- Re: Growth Rate of Level-k Goodstein Function
- From: r.e.s.
- Re: Growth Rate of Level-k Goodstein Function
- Prev by Date: Hopcroft-Tarjan Planarity Algorithm (problem with edge weighting?)
- Next by Date: Re: Direct Euler Cycle and de Brujin Sequence
- Previous by thread: Re: Growth Rate of Level-k Goodstein Function
- Next by thread: Re: Growth Rate of Level-k Goodstein Function
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|