Re: Counter example for Mr. Diaby algorithm solving TSP problem in polynomial time



In article <1161789648.026346.236980@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
<moustapha.diaby@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
So, I think the easiest thing for you to do (and in fact, I eagerly
invite you to do this) is for you to simply point out the flaw(s) in
the (very humble) mathematics in my paper.

After seeing how you have responded to Moews and Hofman, I do not expect
that you will listen carefully to any criticisms that I present. So I
will not bother to try.

I will say that every time that I have witnessed the following sequence
of events---

- someone presents the solution to a mathematical problem

- someone else, who is even moderately competent, studies the
solution carefully and finds something wrong or unclear, and
brings it to the attention of the solver

---the objection is either correct (this is almost always the case), or
the objector quickly sees his misunderstanding after a brief conversation.

It is of course possible that your case is the first counterexample in
the history of mathematics, but I doubt it, because I can tell from your
responses to Moews and Hofman that you are more interested in defending
yourself than in trying to understand their objections.
--
Tim Chow tchow-at-alum-dot-mit-dot-edu
The range of our projectiles---even ... the artillery---however great, will
never exceed four of those miles of which as many thousand separate us from
the center of the earth. ---Galileo, Dialogues Concerning Two New Sciences
.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Counter example for Mr. Diaby algorithm solving TSP problem in polynomial time
    ... the mathematics in my paper. ... After seeing how you have responded to Moews and Hofman, ... ---the objection is either correct, ...
    (comp.theory)
  • Re: Demonstrating that 0.999... = 1
    ... but I can't quite see the relevance of it as an objection. ... Find a book on mathematics. ... Or if you want an online reference look at the place in the FAQ ... >infinity does not imply somewhere where you can examine a property. ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Cardinality question
    ... >> Cantorians I am open for any objection. ... the existing set theory is welcome in order to suppress ... of mathematics have to learn so much arbitrarily sophisticated stuff ... Eckard ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Hofman and Diaby talk about P=NP at INFORMS 2007
    ... mathematical problem-solvers of our generation is a mathematical idiot. ... mathematics. ... I am not calling Moews or Hofman or anyone else "a mathematical ...
    (comp.theory)
  • Re: Roberts neutrino factory.
    ... Often I may anticipate an objection and have ... > |> but he doesn't realise the cuckoo transformations are not science. ... > We use symbols to represent reality and mathematics to manipulate ... > that can see reason, ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)