Re: An easy way to prove P != NP
- From: "Mitch" <maharri@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 6 Nov 2006 07:58:11 -0800
Proginoskes wrote:
There can't be a trivial argument, one way or another. Someone else
would have found it thirty years ago, and we wouldn't be having this
discussion.
In defence of science, this is really only a heuristic. A very strong
heuristic, but still just a heuristic.
Mitch
.
- References:
- An easy way to prove P != NP
- From: Craig Feinstein
- Re: An easy way to prove P != NP
- From: eKo1
- Re: An easy way to prove P != NP
- From: Craig Feinstein
- Re: An easy way to prove P != NP
- From: A . L .
- Re: An easy way to prove P != NP
- From: Radoslaw Hofman
- Re: An easy way to prove P != NP
- From: mathisart
- Re: An easy way to prove P != NP
- From: Craig Feinstein
- Re: An easy way to prove P != NP
- From: Proginoskes
- An easy way to prove P != NP
- Prev by Date: Re: Discussion regarding Mr. Diabys algorithm
- Next by Date: Re: Discussion regarding Mr. Diabys algorithm
- Previous by thread: Re: An easy way to prove P != NP
- Next by thread: Re: An easy way to prove P != NP
- Index(es):