Re: An easy way to prove P != NP
- From: Patricia Shanahan <pats@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 18:49:15 GMT
Craig Feinstein wrote:
Patricia Shanahan wrote:....
....If you are now merely claiming a hand-waving argument that happens to
satisfy you, and to work for some selected examples, fine. To make your
paper accurate, you need to edit it to remove the claim to be a proof.
I'm not going to change my paper for you.
I certainly hope you won't change it for me.
Any change should be for the sake of improving the accuracy of your
published writings, a far higher objective than pleasing an individual
reader.
Patricia
.
- References:
- An easy way to prove P != NP
- From: Craig Feinstein
- Re: An easy way to prove P != NP
- From: Craig Feinstein
- Re: An easy way to prove P != NP
- From: Patricia Shanahan
- Re: An easy way to prove P != NP
- From: Craig Feinstein
- Re: An easy way to prove P != NP
- From: Antti Virtanen
- Re: An easy way to prove P != NP
- From: Patricia Shanahan
- Re: An easy way to prove P != NP
- From: Craig Feinstein
- Re: An easy way to prove P != NP
- From: Patricia Shanahan
- Re: An easy way to prove P != NP
- From: Craig Feinstein
- Re: An easy way to prove P != NP
- From: Patricia Shanahan
- Re: An easy way to prove P != NP
- From: Craig Feinstein
- Re: An easy way to prove P != NP
- From: Patricia Shanahan
- Re: An easy way to prove P != NP
- From: Craig Feinstein
- An easy way to prove P != NP
- Prev by Date: Re: An easy way to prove P != NP
- Next by Date: Re: An easy way to prove P != NP
- Previous by thread: Re: An easy way to prove P != NP
- Next by thread: Re: An easy way to prove P != NP
- Index(es):