Re: Question on computational complexity
- From: Anuj Dawar <ad260@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 10:05:23 +0000
Artyom wrote:
3) Can we have in general a set of graphs(or any other structures asThe condition on "similar" that you state in that thread:
well) hard for some complexity class not weaker than LOGSPACE such that
all its large enough members look quite similar. Some strict statement
of what "similar" means is here, for example:
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/9d100bc307771720
> Can we find set of graphs S such that for any k there is N satisfying:
> any two graphs of order larger than N satisfy the same first-order
> formulas with at most k quantifiers, or equivalently are
> undistinguashable by a k-round Ehrefeucht-Fraisse game?
would imply that S is itself definable by a first-order formula
and therefore that S is in AC^0 and hence not hard for LOGSPACE
or higher classes.
So, the answer to your question is no.
-AD.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Question on computational complexity
- From: Artyom
- Re: Question on computational complexity
- References:
- Question on computational complexity
- From: Artyom
- Question on computational complexity
- Prev by Date: Re: Discussion regarding Mr. Diabys algorithm
- Next by Date: Discussion about transformation TSP to UniqueTSP
- Previous by thread: Question on computational complexity
- Next by thread: Re: Question on computational complexity
- Index(es):