Re: Question on computational complexity
- From: "Artyom" <Artyom.Chernikov@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 27 Nov 2006 05:21:57 -0800
Thanks for reply, Anuj!
Maybe I have stated that desired condition somewhat vague, so I restate
it once more for clarity:
Can we find set of graphs S such that for any k there is N satisfying:
any two graphs from S of order larger than N satisfy the same
first-order
formulas with at most k quantifiers, or equivalently are
undistinguashable by a k-round Ehrefeucht-Fraisse game?
It seems to me that your statement of necessarily FO-definability of S
is wrong.
Take, for example, S to be cycle graphs C_n. Then S is obviously not
first-order definable, by playing for each fixed k on large enough
C_{2n} and 2*C_n. On the other hand, for each fixed k, C_n and C_m with
large enough m and n are indistinguishable as well.
So, it seems question is somewhat subtler.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Question on computational complexity
- From: Anuj Dawar
- Re: Question on computational complexity
- References:
- Question on computational complexity
- From: Artyom
- Re: Question on computational complexity
- From: Anuj Dawar
- Question on computational complexity
- Prev by Date: Re: Discussion about transformation TSP to UniqueTSP
- Next by Date: Re: Discussion regarding Mr. Diabys algorithm
- Previous by thread: Re: Question on computational complexity
- Next by thread: Re: Question on computational complexity
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|