Re: Discussion about transformation TSP to UniqueTSP




Uzytkownik "deepakc" <deepakc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> napisal w wiadomosci
news:1164787821.263354.258940@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
So given Q = Q1 U Q2 U Q3 U Q4 U.....U Qn, and if it is given that Q is
NP-Complete, and given that each of Qi ! = NULL forall i in [1,N], then
we can conclude that....each Qi forall is NP-Complete, i in [1,N].

No :). Proof by counter example:

Q1 - SAT language
Q2 - 2SAT language

Q2 is "subset" of Q1.

Q1 is NP-complete, Q2 is in P.

Cheers,

Radek Hofman


.



Relevant Pages