# Re: "Size Balanced Tree" - more efficient than any known algorithm?

*From*: sillybanter@xxxxxxxxx*Date*: Tue, 02 Jan 2007 04:37:59 GMT

Booted Cat <yaoziyuan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

PtoC (source code and binaries for Windows):

http://www.garret.ru/~knizhnik/pascal.html

Yes, I've got ptoc... still horrendous code, no matter what

programming language....

--

Steve Stringer

sillybanter@xxxxxxxxx

.

**Follow-Ups**:**Re: "Size Balanced Tree" - more efficient than any known algorithm?***From:*Booted Cat

**References**:**"Size Balanced Tree" - more efficient than any known algorithm?***From:*Booted Cat

**Re: "Size Balanced Tree" - more efficient than any known algorithm?***From:*A . L .

**Re: "Size Balanced Tree" - more efficient than any known algorithm?***From:*Booted Cat

**Re: "Size Balanced Tree" - more efficient than any known algorithm?***From:*Booted Cat

**Re: "Size Balanced Tree" - more efficient than any known algorithm?***From:*Booted Cat

**Re: "Size Balanced Tree" - more efficient than any known algorithm?***From:*Booted Cat

**Re: "Size Balanced Tree" - more efficient than any known algorithm?***From:*sillybanter

**Re: "Size Balanced Tree" - more efficient than any known algorithm?***From:*Booted Cat

**Re: "Size Balanced Tree" - more efficient than any known algorithm?***From:*Booted Cat

- Prev by Date:
**Re: Multiply Linear Polynomials** - Next by Date:
**Re: "Size Balanced Tree" - more efficient than any known algorithm?** - Previous by thread:
**Re: "Size Balanced Tree" - more efficient than any known algorithm?** - Next by thread:
**Re: "Size Balanced Tree" - more efficient than any known algorithm?** - Index(es):