Re: "Size Balanced Tree"  more efficient than any known algorithm?
 From: sillybanter@xxxxxxxxx
 Date: Tue, 02 Jan 2007 04:37:59 GMT
Booted Cat <yaoziyuan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
PtoC (source code and binaries for Windows):
http://www.garret.ru/~knizhnik/pascal.html
Yes, I've got ptoc... still horrendous code, no matter what
programming language....

Steve Stringer
sillybanter@xxxxxxxxx
.
 FollowUps:
 Re: "Size Balanced Tree"  more efficient than any known algorithm?
 From: Booted Cat
 Re: "Size Balanced Tree"  more efficient than any known algorithm?
 References:
 "Size Balanced Tree"  more efficient than any known algorithm?
 From: Booted Cat
 Re: "Size Balanced Tree"  more efficient than any known algorithm?
 From: A . L .
 Re: "Size Balanced Tree"  more efficient than any known algorithm?
 From: Booted Cat
 Re: "Size Balanced Tree"  more efficient than any known algorithm?
 From: Booted Cat
 Re: "Size Balanced Tree"  more efficient than any known algorithm?
 From: Booted Cat
 Re: "Size Balanced Tree"  more efficient than any known algorithm?
 From: Booted Cat
 Re: "Size Balanced Tree"  more efficient than any known algorithm?
 From: sillybanter
 Re: "Size Balanced Tree"  more efficient than any known algorithm?
 From: Booted Cat
 Re: "Size Balanced Tree"  more efficient than any known algorithm?
 From: Booted Cat
 "Size Balanced Tree"  more efficient than any known algorithm?
 Prev by Date: Re: Multiply Linear Polynomials
 Next by Date: Re: "Size Balanced Tree"  more efficient than any known algorithm?
 Previous by thread: Re: "Size Balanced Tree"  more efficient than any known algorithm?
 Next by thread: Re: "Size Balanced Tree"  more efficient than any known algorithm?
 Index(es):
Relevant Pages
