Re: Hofman and Diaby talk about P=NP at INFORMS 2007
- From: tchow@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: 10 Feb 2007 18:22:47 GMT
In article <45c9ea9f$0$562$b45e6eb0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, I wrote:
So there are 31988850360320 variables and 14155377697 constraints.
Moews and Hofman have checked all 14155377697 constraints and have not
been able to find a violated constraint.
Professor Diaby, this is a reminder that we are still waiting for your
response. You asked us to determine how many constraints Moews and Hofman
checked, and to compare this with how many constraints they *should* have
checked. We now know that they checked 14155377697 constraints, and this
also appears to me to be the correct number of constraints that they
*should* have checked. Therefore, the simple counting procedure that you
suggested has not uncovered the violated constraint.
So I repeat: David Moews has responded promptly to your request. Will
you now respond promptly to my request, to find the violated constraint?
--
Tim Chow tchow-at-alum-dot-mit-dot-edu
The range of our projectiles---even ... the artillery---however great, will
never exceed four of those miles of which as many thousand separate us from
the center of the earth. ---Galileo, Dialogues Concerning Two New Sciences
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Hofman and Diaby talk about P=NP at INFORMS 2007
- From: moustapha . diaby
- Re: Hofman and Diaby talk about P=NP at INFORMS 2007
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: Do Write Once TM's Halt?
- Next by Date: Re: Do Write Once TM's Halt?
- Previous by thread: Re: Hofman and Diaby talk about P=NP at INFORMS 2007
- Next by thread: Re: Hofman and Diaby talk about P=NP at INFORMS 2007
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|