Re: My LP Formulation of the TSP: Conclusions
- From: tchow@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: 30 Mar 2007 14:12:11 GMT
In article <euiakm$cog$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Radoslaw Hofman <radekh@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Well, you have repeated continously that "every thing was in your paper" and
it occured even to you that it was wrong. Still same arguments?
In this particular instance, Diaby seems to be under the (mis)impression
that you don't understand the basic textbook facts about the assignment
polytope.
--
Tim Chow tchow-at-alum-dot-mit-dot-edu
The range of our projectiles---even ... the artillery---however great, will
never exceed four of those miles of which as many thousand separate us from
the center of the earth. ---Galileo, Dialogues Concerning Two New Sciences
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: My LP Formulation of the TSP: Conclusions
- From: moustapha . diaby
- Re: My LP Formulation of the TSP: Conclusions
- References:
- My LP Formulation of the TSP: Conclusions
- From: moustapha . diaby
- Re: My LP Formulation of the TSP: Conclusions
- From: A . L .
- Re: My LP Formulation of the TSP: Conclusions
- From: moustapha . diaby
- Re: My LP Formulation of the TSP: Conclusions
- From: Radoslaw Hofman
- My LP Formulation of the TSP: Conclusions
- Prev by Date: Re: Is it possible to generate a context-free grammar for a programming language?
- Next by Date: Re: My LP Formulation of the TSP: Conclusions
- Previous by thread: Re: My LP Formulation of the TSP: Conclusions
- Next by thread: Re: My LP Formulation of the TSP: Conclusions
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|