Re: My LP Formulation of the TSP: Conclusions
- From: tchow@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: 30 Mar 2007 19:59:05 GMT
In article <1175269178.977762.70660@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
<moustapha.diaby@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
So, may be *you* can explain to everybody what the "basic textbook
facts about the assignment polytope" are that Hofman understands?
For example, that it has integer vertices, and so an optimal integer
solution may be found by linear programming.
What Hofman is pointing out is that your claims about the TSP do not
follow from the properties of the assignment polytope, and that your
attempt to prove otherwise is broken.
--
Tim Chow tchow-at-alum-dot-mit-dot-edu
The range of our projectiles---even ... the artillery---however great, will
never exceed four of those miles of which as many thousand separate us from
the center of the earth. ---Galileo, Dialogues Concerning Two New Sciences
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: My LP Formulation of the TSP: Conclusions
- From: moustapha . diaby
- Re: My LP Formulation of the TSP: Conclusions
- References:
- My LP Formulation of the TSP: Conclusions
- From: moustapha . diaby
- Re: My LP Formulation of the TSP: Conclusions
- From: Radoslaw Hofman
- Re: My LP Formulation of the TSP: Conclusions
- From: tchow
- Re: My LP Formulation of the TSP: Conclusions
- From: moustapha . diaby
- My LP Formulation of the TSP: Conclusions
- Prev by Date: Re: Longest path
- Next by Date: Re: Is it possible to generate a context-free grammar for a programming language?
- Previous by thread: Re: My LP Formulation of the TSP: Conclusions
- Next by thread: Re: My LP Formulation of the TSP: Conclusions
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|