Re: My LP Formulation of the TSP: Conclusions

On Mar 30, 7:33 pm, A.L. <f...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 30 Mar 2007 16:09:30 -0700, moustapha.di...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
wrote:



I am waiting to see Hofman's counter-examples (or yours for that
matter) for my model in the IMECS proceedings

What about SIAM Journal On Optimization, for example?...

A.L.


Ok, while he is at it Hofman can provide a "counter-example" for your
model in SIAM Journal On Optimization too.

//MD




.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Garbage collection problem
    ... The whole point of optimization is to ... > same camp as Chris Smith on the matter. ... declare a scope for the variable I may be depending on the object remaining ...
    (comp.lang.java.programmer)
  • Re: Boxing and Unboxing ??
    ... This aspect is not a matter of optimization, it is a matter of preventing ... which is to pass "in" value types by reference ... I can see the merits of applying a "const" attribute to reference types ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.languages.csharp)
  • Re: Evolution of PL/I
    ... Doesn't matter, the optimization is the samer anyway. ... create the trees and the optimizer will do what it can, maybe fold constants, ... You may end up generating differnet instructions sequences depending on the architecure. ...
    (comp.lang.pl1)
  • Re: Boxing and Unboxing ??
    ... don't modify large value-type parameters"? ... This aspect is not a matter of optimization, it is a matter of preventing ... which is to pass "in" value types by reference ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.languages.csharp)
  • Re: Boxing and Unboxing ??
    ... don't modify large value-type parameters"? ... This aspect is not a matter of optimization, it is a matter of preventing ... which is to pass "in" value types by reference ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.languages.csharp)