Re: Intractability Problem (reduction form 3SAT)





Uzytkownik "Ez_Alg" <virtualrealtor@xxxxxxxxx> napisal w wiadomosci
news:1174259673.863479.303370@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

How do we show that if EXPERIMENTAL CUISINE is solvable in polynomial
time, then so is 3SAT.

We cannot because it is not true :)



This problem is solvable in polynomial time - it is simple optimization
problem (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linear_Programming)



To create similar NP-hard problem you require additional restrictions - for
example matrix of availability (you have only certain quantity of each
integrate) together with discretion (imagine using packs of integrated, so
if you decide to add A then you have to add 1 pack of A - first would say
that you have only X packs of A available). This one should be harder - you
have to check if it is NP-hard by reduction known NP-complete problem TO it
(consider Knapsack problem).



Remember also that NP-hardness is considered regarding decision problems, so
you have to consider decision problem: for example is there a solution such
that penalty is equal to Y.



Best regards,



Radek Hofman




.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: NP - Hard -- Approximation algos
    ... > polynomial time. ... > algorithm which solves it. ... The real answer to question 2 is that the problem is NP-hard ... might be unhelpful - however, this question is more philosophical than ...
    (sci.crypt)
  • Re: NP-hard problems
    ... As I understand a problem is said to be NP-Hard if there is no ... polynomial time algorithm that can solve it. ... But what if I have a logarithmic algorithm that solves the problem? ... Comparing the first 2 elements is O. ...
    (sci.math)