Fibonacci heap and Dijkstra's algorithm

I have a question regarding the performance of the Dijkstra's
algorithm using different heap implementations.

Suppose that the size of the graphs is around 50 nodes to 250 nodes,
number of edges is around 50 to 300. Is it worth using Fibonacci heap
in the Dijkstra's algorithm or just using simple priority queue? Any
pointer?

Thank you.

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Sean PItman and nested hierarchy
    ... if God created life then the patterns in the ... the concept of "uniform probability distribution" is well-defined. ... Since the vast majority of the graphs ... Yes, it can, depending on the algorithm used. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Sean PItman and nested hierarchy
    ... the concept of "uniform probability distribution" is well-defined. ... Since the vast majority of the graphs ... Yes, it can, depending on the algorithm used. ... Separate creation can produce any pattern whatsoever, including a nested hierarchy. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Is graph isomorphism in P?
    ... algorithm runs in polynomial time. ... graphs which are "pathological", so most of the time, you can solve NP- ... This is also why the average running time is not a good measure; ... isomorphism problem, where you only look at graphs with at most 400 ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Sean PItman and nested hierarchy
    ... if God created life then the patterns in the ... Since the vast majority of the graphs ... Yes, it can, depending on the algorithm used. ... create a tangled loop in the graph. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Sean PItman and nested hierarchy
    ... the concept of "uniform probability distribution" is well-defined. ... Since the vast majority of the graphs ... Yes, it can, depending on the algorithm used. ... why would this one produce bins (the various ...
    (talk.origins)