Re: Context Free language, the language empty string (lambda)
- From: Jym <Jean-Yves.Moyen+news@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 21:38:18 +0200
On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 16:03:16 +0200, cyberbloke <cyberbloke@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Which context free language corresponds to the language empty string
(lambda):
S-->aS
S-->empty string
or
S-->aS
or
S-->empty string
or all of the above. Can you explain if possible, trying to
understand the concept.
If you can't answer that question, then you *seriously* need to at least read your lesson about grammar before asking someone else to do your homework.
Maybe you should start by trying to "run" the grammar and see what you get. You'll probably have most of the answer to your questions in a time no bigger than the one needed to send your message on comp.theory *and* you'll really learn something in the process.
In the case of this question, whatever I could see to explain the answer is most certainly present in the textbook or in the lecture on the subject from which the exercice is taken. This is direct application of the definitions.
--
Hypocoristiquement,
Jym.
.
- References:
- Context Free language, the language empty string (lambda)
- From: cyberbloke
- Context Free language, the language empty string (lambda)
- Prev by Date: Re: Context Free language, the language empty string (lambda)
- Next by Date: Re: NP-Complete Definition
- Previous by thread: Re: Context Free language, the language empty string (lambda)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|