Re: Hardware random generators and nondeterminsm
- From: Casey Hawthorne <caseyhHAMMER_TIME@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 17:29:07 GMT
Tim Tyler <seemysig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
rpost wrote:
coonalkadam07@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
Firstly, all machines built by human hands are finite state machines
because infinite tapes simply do not exist.
Wrong.
The Turing machine is a very finite machine. It doesn't require an
infinite tape. All it requires is that tape is supplied as needed.
Some programs do require an infinite tape - and if you can't execute
those, your supposed Turing machine is not universal.
If a program required an infinite tape, wouldn't that program be
non-halting?
--
Regards,
Casey
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Hardware random generators and nondeterminsm
- From: Tim Tyler
- Re: Hardware random generators and nondeterminsm
- References:
- Hardware random generators and nondeterminsm
- From: coonalkadam07@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Hardware random generators and nondeterminsm
- From: coonalkadam07@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Hardware random generators and nondeterminsm
- From: Patricia Shanahan
- Re: Hardware random generators and nondeterminsm
- From: coonalkadam07@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Hardware random generators and nondeterminsm
- From: rpost
- Re: Hardware random generators and nondeterminsm
- From: Tim Tyler
- Hardware random generators and nondeterminsm
- Prev by Date: Re: Hardware random generators and nondeterminsm
- Next by Date: Re: Hardware random generators and nondeterminsm
- Previous by thread: Re: Hardware random generators and nondeterminsm
- Next by thread: Re: Hardware random generators and nondeterminsm
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|