Re: Can propositions be classified into type-n?
- From: Mitch <maharri@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 07:31:24 -0700 (PDT)
On Apr 7, 2:35 pm, sip...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
Given that propositional calculus deals with propositions, can the
propositions be classified into any in Chomsky hierarchy? Aren't
propositions generative grammars?
Items that can be placed in the Chomsky hierarchy are languages (which
are sets of strings, usually defined using a grammar or machine).
Propositional calculus is a computational mechanism for determining
truth. It is usually presented with a syntax (a grammar) that is
fairly simple (variables, and, or not, true false, and parens), where
the parens or implicit precedence of operators require a context-free
grammar.
The language (syntax rules) of PC is context free.
So particular propositions cannot really be placed in the Chomsky
hierarchy, but a given logic (like propositional calculus) has a
syntax that can be placed there.
The importance of PC is not in its language but in the truth functions
it can describe.
Mitch
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Can propositions be classified into type-n?
- From: sipayi
- Re: Can propositions be classified into type-n?
- References:
- Can propositions be classified into type-n?
- From: sipayi
- Can propositions be classified into type-n?
- Prev by Date: Re: Automatic text tagging
- Next by Date: Re: find all directed paths between a source and destination
- Previous by thread: Can propositions be classified into type-n?
- Next by thread: Re: Can propositions be classified into type-n?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|