Re: Proving a Language Is Not a CFL
- From: Bernd L <berndlosert@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 4 May 2008 10:44:09 -0700 (PDT)
On May 4, 1:35 pm, Ben Bacarisse <ben.use...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
We are told to expect that not(C is CF). You show an example of D
that is regular and are surprised that (C /\ D) is CF but the
implication above is one way. It does not prohibit
not(C is CF) and (D regular) and (C /\ D) is CF
The theorem says that C's intersection with *all* regular languages is
CF. I image that you are expected to find one (or more) regular
languages whose intersection with C is clearly *not* a CFL. Does that
help?
I understand now. Thanks.
.
- References:
- Proving a Language Is Not a CFL
- From: Bernd L
- Re: Proving a Language Is Not a CFL
- From: Ben Bacarisse
- Proving a Language Is Not a CFL
- Prev by Date: Re: Proving a Language Is Not a CFL
- Next by Date: Re: Proving a Language Is Not a CFL
- Previous by thread: Re: Proving a Language Is Not a CFL
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|