Re: Can EXPTIME and NP be separated via diagonalization?
- From: tchow@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: 07 Aug 2008 15:31:29 GMT
In article <dbc7e189-f217-494a-8f7b-1859d0c9292d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
<cplxphil@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Step 1: Nondeterministically guess an algorithm X that solves the
inputted language in time bounded by x^k+k; or guess that no such
algorithm exists. Now we must verify that the algorithm works.
I think you have a misconception about how nondeterminism works. In
particular it's unclear how you can nondeterministically guess an algorithm
and simultaneously nondeterministically guess that no algorithm exists.
As you yourself say, if you're not worried about the running time, you can
replace nondeterminism by determinism. I think if you try describing your
algorithm purely deterministically, you will see the problem with your
construction.
--
Tim Chow tchow-at-alum-dot-mit-dot-edu
The range of our projectiles---even ... the artillery---however great, will
never exceed four of those miles of which as many thousand separate us from
the center of the earth. ---Galileo, Dialogues Concerning Two New Sciences
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Can EXPTIME and NP be separated via diagonalization?
- From: cplxphil
- Re: Can EXPTIME and NP be separated via diagonalization?
- References:
- Can EXPTIME and NP be separated via diagonalization?
- From: cplxphil
- Re: Can EXPTIME and NP be separated via diagonalization?
- From: cplxphil
- Re: Can EXPTIME and NP be separated via diagonalization?
- From: tchow
- Re: Can EXPTIME and NP be separated via diagonalization?
- From: cplxphil
- Can EXPTIME and NP be separated via diagonalization?
- Prev by Date: Re: Integer Factorization with SAT
- Next by Date: Re: Can EXPTIME and NP be separated via diagonalization?
- Previous by thread: Re: Can EXPTIME and NP be separated via diagonalization?
- Next by thread: Re: Can EXPTIME and NP be separated via diagonalization?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|