Re: Fortnow's paper regarding the status of the P vs. NP problem
- From: tchow@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: 06 Nov 2009 01:05:39 GMT
In article <slrnhf6t1v.n6v.tim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Tim Little <tim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The biggest obstacle is that verifying that an algorithm runs in
polynomial time is not in general an operation that can be conducted
in polynomial time. It is not even computable whether it returns a
result at all.
Technically, you are correct, but this is not actually a serious obstacle.
One can restrict to Turing machines that are "polynomially clocked"; that
is, the operating system forces the algorithm to stop after n^3 steps (or
whatever polynomial you want) and outputs "no" if the algorithm hasn't
made up its mind yet by then. Any polynomial-time algorithm that is
computable by a Turing machine is also computable by a polynomially clocked
Turing machine, and for polynomially clocked machines we don't have any
undecidability problems.
Basically, Phil, your intuition is sound, and if Fortnow writes back, there
is a good chance that he will just say what you've already said. The idea
goes all the way back to Goedel's "lost" letter to von Neumann, in which he
pointed out that one can circumvent the undecidability of theoremhood by
putting a bound on the length of the proof we're willing to search for.
Then the problem becomes an NP-complete problem.
--
Tim Chow tchow-at-alum-dot-mit-dot-edu
The range of our projectiles---even ... the artillery---however great, will
never exceed four of those miles of which as many thousand separate us from
the center of the earth. ---Galileo, Dialogues Concerning Two New Sciences
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Fortnow's paper regarding the status of the P vs. NP problem
- From: Tim Little
- Re: Fortnow's paper regarding the status of the P vs. NP problem
- References:
- Fortnow's paper regarding the status of the P vs. NP problem
- From: cplxphil
- Re: Fortnow's paper regarding the status of the P vs. NP problem
- From: tchow
- Re: Fortnow's paper regarding the status of the P vs. NP problem
- From: cplxphil
- Re: Fortnow's paper regarding the status of the P vs. NP problem
- From: Tim Little
- Fortnow's paper regarding the status of the P vs. NP problem
- Prev by Date: Re: Fortnow's paper regarding the status of the P vs. NP problem
- Next by Date: primal vs dual
- Previous by thread: Re: Fortnow's paper regarding the status of the P vs. NP problem
- Next by thread: Re: Fortnow's paper regarding the status of the P vs. NP problem
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|